
Originally Posted by
sunnysoul
Again though, that's not what I meant. If you apply for a job, for example, then you are not interviewing against the other candidates or making it about the other applicants, you are interviewing FOR the job that you believe you will bring the necessary experience, knowledge, passion, or any other trait to that job, along with the right mentality and personality, which helps show that you are the best fit for that job. It doesn't matter how many applicants there are for it. You are competing for a job, not against an individual. That's all i'm trying to say. If you are the second or third person to apply for the job and interview it doesn't mean you are competing against the first person that interviewed or applied, just because you apply first doesn't mean that the job is yours and that everybody else has to prove how they are better than that first applicant. It doesn't matter who applies first, it's about finding the best candidate. In the interview you don't talk about how bad the other candidates are and how their ideas for the job won't work, in politics you do unfortunately which needs to change, you talk about what YOU bring to the job and how YOUR experience is what makes you the best fit.
Trump is not entitled to the nomination simply because he was president in the past or because he declared his candidacy first. If DeSantis is running so that Trump won't be president then that's one thing, but if he is running because he wants the job, then that's nothing personal towards anybody else in my opinion. I totally understand it's a competition to an extent, and that you are competing against others, I get that, but what I am saying is that I want a candidate that is running for something and not against someone. We need less being against things in this country and more talking about what you are for. I'm not looking forward to a political season of candidates telling me why other people are so bad while never telling me why they are good.
I recognize that this is more of a philosophical argument, but the basic point is that you can compete for something of value against other people that also want to earn or win that item (in this case elected office) and you can do that and NOT have it be personal. People seem to think that anybody that runs for president, even if for sincere reasons, is doing it in order to be against Trump. That type of belief just strokes ego in my opinion.