User Tag List

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 24

Thread: Why only mRNA vaccines?

  1. #1
    Alumni Member Forum Donor
    V.I.P
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteranTagger First ClassSocial
    Overall activity: 95.0%

    dinosaur's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    16,974
    Thanks
    51,353
    Thanked: 38,925
    Rep Power
    21474859

    Why only mRNA vaccines?

    I'm not sure where to ask or discuss this, so the Covid forum seems like the logical choice ...

    Simply, It's been over 3 years. Originally, we were told, with the need for speed, that the fastest way to success was a new and experimental mRNA technology. Other, more conventional technology vaccines were also developed, but here we are, after three years, still running full bore down the mRNA pathway, instead of alternate, more proven vaccine technologies. Sure, any vaccine can be a problem, but it appears mRNA vaccines have adverse effects that are both deadly and long lived.

    1. Why are J&J vaccines and other lower tech vaccines not available or being offered?

    2. Why are they still pushing mRNA vaccines and ignoring the adverse effects?

    3. Why, after 3 years, are there no vaccines with better efficacy and are safer? They've had 3 years!

    4. Why are they pushing to expand vaccine use in risk groups with miniscule risk?

    This is like "damned the torpedoes! full speed ahead!"

  2. The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to dinosaur For This Useful Post:

    Camp (01-25-2023),Foghorn (01-25-2023),Freewill (01-25-2023),gregonejeep (01-25-2023),Mr. Claws (01-25-2023),Old Tex (01-25-2023),OldSchool (01-25-2023),Physics Hunter (01-25-2023),Quark (01-25-2023),WarriorRob (01-25-2023)

  3. #2
    Alumni Member V.I.P Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsSocial1 year registered
    Overall activity: 79.0%

    WarriorRob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2020
    Location
    Missouri
    Posts
    15,027
    Thanks
    52,699
    Thanked: 30,926
    Rep Power
    21474854
    They need to launch investigations into all of those questions.

    I think it's to make the DemonRat donors Rich, It's Political of course and it's also something sinister.

  4. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to WarriorRob For This Useful Post:

    Camp (01-25-2023),dinosaur (01-25-2023),OldSchool (01-25-2023),Physics Hunter (01-25-2023)

  5. #3
    Alumni Member Forum Donor
    V.I.P
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteranTagger First ClassSocial
    Overall activity: 95.0%

    dinosaur's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    16,974
    Thanks
    51,353
    Thanked: 38,925
    Rep Power
    21474859
    Some countries opted for vax technology that was not mRNA. Are those countries having "died suddenly" problems or is it just the countries that pushed the mRNA crap? Would we know either way? Seems to me that comparative studies would clearly show a difference, if there was one. Is the data there, and there is just data overload or under reporting?

    By now, I would think we should know these answers.

  6. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to dinosaur For This Useful Post:

    Camp (01-25-2023),Foghorn (01-25-2023),Mr. Claws (01-25-2023),OldSchool (01-25-2023),Physics Hunter (01-25-2023),WarriorRob (01-25-2023)

  7. #4
    Alumni Member V.I.P Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsSocialYour first GroupRecommendation Second ClassTagger Second ClassVeteran
    Overall activity: 57.0%

    Physics Hunter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2019
    Posts
    15,002
    Thanks
    10,745
    Thanked: 19,313
    Rep Power
    21474855
    Since I took the J&J, I will have to look to see if they pulled it.

    I know Fauxi eventually said that it covered me for about 3 weeks...
    Scientist, Evangelical Christian - reformed, father, entrepreneur, hunter, outdoorsman, motorcyclist, Constitutional Conservative.

  8. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Physics Hunter For This Useful Post:

    Camp (01-25-2023),dinosaur (01-25-2023),WarriorRob (01-25-2023)

  9. #5
    Alumni Member V.I.P Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsSocialYour first GroupRecommendation Second ClassTagger Second ClassVeteran
    Overall activity: 57.0%

    Physics Hunter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2019
    Posts
    15,002
    Thanks
    10,745
    Thanked: 19,313
    Rep Power
    21474855
    Quote Originally Posted by dinosaur View Post
    I'm not sure where to ask or discuss this, so the Covid forum seems like the logical choice ...

    Simply, It's been over 3 years. Originally, we were told, with the need for speed, that the fastest way to success was a new and experimental mRNA technology. Other, more conventional technology vaccines were also developed, but here we are, after three years, still running full bore down the mRNA pathway, instead of alternate, more proven vaccine technologies. Sure, any vaccine can be a problem, but it appears mRNA vaccines have adverse effects that are both deadly and long lived.

    1. Why are J&J vaccines and other lower tech vaccines not available or being offered?

    2. Why are they still pushing mRNA vaccines and ignoring the adverse effects?

    3. Why, after 3 years, are there no vaccines with better efficacy and are safer? They've had 3 years!

    4. Why are they pushing to expand vaccine use in risk groups with miniscule risk?

    This is like "damned the torpedoes! full speed ahead!"
    Good clear thinking Dino!
    Scientist, Evangelical Christian - reformed, father, entrepreneur, hunter, outdoorsman, motorcyclist, Constitutional Conservative.

  10. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Physics Hunter For This Useful Post:

    dinosaur (01-25-2023),WarriorRob (01-25-2023)

  11. #6
    Alumni Member V.I.P Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsSocialYour first GroupRecommendation Second ClassTagger Second ClassVeteran
    Overall activity: 57.0%

    Physics Hunter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2019
    Posts
    15,002
    Thanks
    10,745
    Thanked: 19,313
    Rep Power
    21474855
    Quote Originally Posted by dinosaur View Post
    Some countries opted for vax technology that was not mRNA. Are those countries having "died suddenly" problems or is it just the countries that pushed the mRNA crap? Would we know either way? Seems to me that comparative studies would clearly show a difference, if there was one. Is the data there, and there is just data overload or under reporting?

    By now, I would think we should know these answers.
    That would be interesting comparative data.

    Are there any nations where there are not statistically significant "excess deaths"?
    Scientist, Evangelical Christian - reformed, father, entrepreneur, hunter, outdoorsman, motorcyclist, Constitutional Conservative.

  12. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Physics Hunter For This Useful Post:

    dinosaur (01-25-2023),Foghorn (01-25-2023),WarriorRob (01-25-2023)

  13. #7
    Pork Eating Infidel Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points
    Overall activity: 34.0%

    old dog's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2016
    Posts
    4,840
    Thanks
    5,410
    Thanked: 10,112
    Rep Power
    7676705
    I had to wait quite a while but got one shot of the J&J because it was not mRNA based.
    “Of three ordinary people, two must have the same sex.”
    Daniel J. Kleitman

  14. The Following User Says Thank You to old dog For This Useful Post:

    dinosaur (01-25-2023)

  15. #8
    Alumni Member V.I.P Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsSocialTagger First ClassCreated Blog entryVeteran
    Overall activity: 73.0%

    Quark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Posts
    47,525
    Thanks
    101,886
    Thanked: 53,767
    Rep Power
    21474891
    Quote Originally Posted by dinosaur View Post
    I'm not sure where to ask or discuss this, so the Covid forum seems like the logical choice ...

    Simply, It's been over 3 years. Originally, we were told, with the need for speed, that the fastest way to success was a new and experimental mRNA technology. Other, more conventional technology vaccines were also developed, but here we are, after three years, still running full bore down the mRNA pathway, instead of alternate, more proven vaccine technologies. Sure, any vaccine can be a problem, but it appears mRNA vaccines have adverse effects that are both deadly and long lived.

    1. Why are J&J vaccines and other lower tech vaccines not available or being offered?

    2. Why are they still pushing mRNA vaccines and ignoring the adverse effects?

    3. Why, after 3 years, are there no vaccines with better efficacy and are safer? They've had 3 years!

    4. Why are they pushing to expand vaccine use in risk groups with miniscule risk?

    This is like "damned the torpedoes! full speed ahead!"
    This is just thought but according to the printed The Epoch Times the mRNA vaccines could just be an experiment for more advanced therapies for things like transgender, transhumanism, etc. Transhumanism is big with the WEF.

  16. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Quark For This Useful Post:

    Big Dummy (01-25-2023),dinosaur (01-25-2023),WarriorRob (01-25-2023)

  17. #9
    Senior Member Achievements:
    50000 Experience Points1 year registered
    Overall activity: 51.0%

    Wilson2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2020
    Posts
    2,515
    Thanks
    1,465
    Thanked: 4,191
    Rep Power
    6253529
    Quote Originally Posted by dinosaur View Post
    I'm not sure where to ask or discuss this, so the Covid forum seems like the logical choice ...

    Simply, It's been over 3 years. Originally, we were told, with the need for speed, that the fastest way to success was a new and experimental mRNA technology. Other, more conventional technology vaccines were also developed, but here we are, after three years, still running full bore down the mRNA pathway, instead of alternate, more proven vaccine technologies. Sure, any vaccine can be a problem, but it appears mRNA vaccines have adverse effects that are both deadly and long lived.

    1. Why are J&J vaccines and other lower tech vaccines not available or being offered?

    2. Why are they still pushing mRNA vaccines and ignoring the adverse effects?

    3. Why, after 3 years, are there no vaccines with better efficacy and are safer? They've had 3 years!

    4. Why are they pushing to expand vaccine use in risk groups with miniscule risk?

    This is like "damned the torpedoes! full speed ahead!"
    I think it was a scam from the very beginning. The only question I have is whether it was released deliberately as part of a plan or it was accidentally released and the globalists saw an opportunity and implemented their plan.

    As to why they still push the mrna vaccines, there must be a nefarious reason. The vax is so clearly flawed and dangerous - particularly when compared to the virus - no rational person would still be pushing for universal vaccination. Maybe its just money, maybe its brainwashing and setting the stage for a major power grab, or something else.

    I didn't take any jab, I advised everyone I know not to take it.
    Matthew 22:36-40 What is the greatest commandment?
    Love the Lord your God with all your heart, with all your soul, and with all your mind. This is the greatest and most important commandment. The second is like it: Love your neighbor as yourself.

  18. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Wilson2 For This Useful Post:

    dinosaur (01-25-2023),Foghorn (01-25-2023),Quark (01-25-2023),WarriorRob (01-25-2023)

  19. #10
    Alumni Member V.I.P Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsSocialYour first GroupRecommendation Second ClassTagger Second ClassVeteran
    Overall activity: 57.0%

    Physics Hunter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2019
    Posts
    15,002
    Thanks
    10,745
    Thanked: 19,313
    Rep Power
    21474855
    It appears that the J&J is still current, but with unstated limitations...

    "Johnson & Johnson’s Janssen (J&J/Janssen) COVID-19 vaccine is a viral vector vaccine and can be given in some situations."

    This from a page on the CDC site that is not difficult to find dated Nov 2022.
    Scientist, Evangelical Christian - reformed, father, entrepreneur, hunter, outdoorsman, motorcyclist, Constitutional Conservative.

  20. The Following User Says Thank You to Physics Hunter For This Useful Post:

    dinosaur (01-25-2023)

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •