Why only mRNA vaccines?

[dinosaur]

I'm not sure where to ask or discuss this, so the Covid forum seems like the logical choice ...

Simply, It's been over 3 years. Originally, we were told, with the need for speed, that the fastest way to success was a new and experimental mRNA technology. Other, more conventional technology vaccines were also developed, but here we are, after three years, still running full bore down the mRNA pathway, instead of alternate, more proven vaccine technologies. Sure, any vaccine can be a problem, but it appears mRNA vaccines have adverse effects that are both deadly and long lived.

1. Why are J&J vaccines and other lower tech vaccines not available or being offered?

2. Why are they still pushing mRNA vaccines and ignoring the adverse effects?

3. Why, after 3 years, are there no vaccines with better efficacy and are safer? They've had 3 years!

4. Why are they pushing to expand vaccine use in risk groups with miniscule risk?

This is like "damned the torpedoes! full speed ahead!"

[WarriorRob]

They need to launch investigations into all of those questions.

I think it's to make the DemonRat donors Rich, It's Political of course and it's also something sinister.

[dinosaur]

Some countries opted for vax technology that was not mRNA. Are those countries having "died suddenly" problems or is it just the countries that pushed the mRNA crap? Would we know either way? Seems to me that comparative studies would clearly show a difference, if there was one. Is the data there, and there is just data overload or under reporting?

By now, I would think we should know these answers.

[Physics Hunter]

Some countries opted for vax technology that was not mRNA. Are those countries having "died suddenly" problems or is it just the countries that pushed the mRNA crap? Would we know either way? Seems to me that comparative studies would clearly show a difference, if there was one. Is the data there, and there is just data overload or under reporting?

By now, I would think we should know these answers.

That would be interesting comparative data.

Are there any nations where there are not statistically significant "excess deaths"?

[Physics Hunter]

Since I took the J&J, I will have to look to see if they pulled it.

I know Fauxi eventually said that it covered me for about 3 weeks...

[Physics Hunter]

I'm not sure where to ask or discuss this, so the Covid forum seems like the logical choice ...

Simply, It's been over 3 years. Originally, we were told, with the need for speed, that the fastest way to success was a new and experimental mRNA technology. Other, more conventional technology vaccines were also developed, but here we are, after three years, still running full bore down the mRNA pathway, instead of alternate, more proven vaccine technologies. Sure, any vaccine can be a problem, but it appears mRNA vaccines have adverse effects that are both deadly and long lived.

1. Why are J&J vaccines and other lower tech vaccines not available or being offered?

2. Why are they still pushing mRNA vaccines and ignoring the adverse effects?

3. Why, after 3 years, are there no vaccines with better efficacy and are safer? They've had 3 years!

4. Why are they pushing to expand vaccine use in risk groups with miniscule risk?

This is like "damned the torpedoes! full speed ahead!"

Good clear thinking Dino!

[old dog]

I had to wait quite a while but got one shot of the J&J because it was not mRNA based.

[Quark]

I'm not sure where to ask or discuss this, so the Covid forum seems like the logical choice ...

Simply, It's been over 3 years. Originally, we were told, with the need for speed, that the fastest way to success was a new and experimental mRNA technology. Other, more conventional technology vaccines were also developed, but here we are, after three years, still running full bore down the mRNA pathway, instead of alternate, more proven vaccine technologies. Sure, any vaccine can be a problem, but it appears mRNA vaccines have adverse effects that are both deadly and long lived.

1. Why are J&J vaccines and other lower tech vaccines not available or being offered?

2. Why are they still pushing mRNA vaccines and ignoring the adverse effects?

3. Why, after 3 years, are there no vaccines with better efficacy and are safer? They've had 3 years!

4. Why are they pushing to expand vaccine use in risk groups with miniscule risk?

This is like "damned the torpedoes! full speed ahead!"

This is just thought but according to the printed The Epoch Times the mRNA vaccines could just be an experiment for more advanced therapies for things like transgender, transhumanism, etc. Transhumanism is big with the WEF.

[Call_me_Ishmael]

This is just thought but according to the printed The Epoch Times the mRNA vaccines could just be an experiment for more advanced therapies for things like transgender, transhumanism, etc. Transhumanism is big with the WEF.

I don't see that as the reason. In fact, since the J&J actually sends DNA into the nucleus (albeit using traditional adenovirus methods of getting it there) I would think that such vaxes would lend themselves to the nefarious objectives moreso than the mRNA technique.

[Wilson2]

I'm not sure where to ask or discuss this, so the Covid forum seems like the logical choice ...

Simply, It's been over 3 years. Originally, we were told, with the need for speed, that the fastest way to success was a new and experimental mRNA technology. Other, more conventional technology vaccines were also developed, but here we are, after three years, still running full bore down the mRNA pathway, instead of alternate, more proven vaccine technologies. Sure, any vaccine can be a problem, but it appears mRNA vaccines have adverse effects that are both deadly and long lived.

1. Why are J&J vaccines and other lower tech vaccines not available or being offered?

2. Why are they still pushing mRNA vaccines and ignoring the adverse effects?

3. Why, after 3 years, are there no vaccines with better efficacy and are safer? They've had 3 years!

4. Why are they pushing to expand vaccine use in risk groups with miniscule risk?

This is like "damned the torpedoes! full speed ahead!"

I think it was a scam from the very beginning. The only question I have is whether it was released deliberately as part of a plan or it was accidentally released and the globalists saw an opportunity and implemented their plan.

As to why they still push the mrna vaccines, there must be a nefarious reason. The vax is so clearly flawed and dangerous - particularly when compared to the virus - no rational person would still be pushing for universal vaccination. Maybe its just money, maybe its brainwashing and setting the stage for a major power grab, or something else.

I didn't take any jab, I advised everyone I know not to take it.