Someone throws a spanner into Black holes

[Physics Hunter]

The infamous " Calabi-Yau " manifold, conjured up to house all those extra dimensions required for the "landscape", or String Theory, or multi-universe theory.

I like science too. But when it comes to eliminating the existence of a Creator in order to advance the preposterous theories of happenstance is ludicrous, and has no place in real scientific discovery, either outside the box or in it.

As to speaking English, it is impossible for the Universe to exist with other Universes. One contains it all. Why would additional ones be necessary? Universe is the entire scope, the whole of everything.

The simplest theory for multiple universes is that in creating something from nothing, one notion is to split nothing into positive and negative something (two opposite universes) spinning around each other in nothing.

But that does not remove God from the picture...

[Dubler9]

Meanwhile..... back in the real world .. where men give birth and men use girls toilets and a retard is elected as leader of the most powerful country on Earth.

[CWF]

My post was not about possibilities. It was about English, the language.

Universe means everything. All of it. The whole, entire, lot. Therefore "multi-universe" is impossible. The term is absurd. That is what I was pointing out.

However, science is soooo sacred. Worshipped as fact. Like the manifold dreamed up by a couple of physicists. Calabi and Yau. Imaginary but viewed as a triumph among those who sniff the underwear of their colleagues.

But theories come and go, soon replaced by others to be ooed and awed about. Hawking was working on his grand "theory of everything". That is damned grand, right? I mean what could come after that one? It would replace all, make the Bible null and void to those who swallowed it, as if it had any merit prior.

Anyway, carry on. My take is not welcome in a "science" party. It Offends them. Imagine that.

[UKSmartypants]

The simplest theory for multiple universes is that in creating something from nothing, one notion is to split nothing into positive and negative something (two opposite universes) spinning around each other in nothing.

But that does not remove God from the picture...

1. absolutely, its perfectly possible theres a parallel universe which is an exact copy (in terms of size energy etc) but with time runnig nbackwards, created the same moment of ours, in order to maintain zero balance.

2. I look forward to your theory on the 11 dimensional God who lives on the compactified Brane.

[UKSmartypants]

My post was not about possibilities. It was about English, the language.

Universe means everything. All of it. The whole, entire, lot. Therefore "multi-universe" is impossible. The term is absurd. That is what I was pointing out.

However, science is soooo sacred. Worshipped as fact. Like the manifold dreamed up by a couple of physicists. Calabi and Yau. Imaginary but viewed as a triumph among those who sniff the underwear of their colleagues.

But theories come and go, soon replaced by others to be ooed and awed about. Hawking was working on his grand "theory of everything". That is damned grand, right? I mean what could come after that one? It would replace all, make the Bible null and void to those who swallowed it, as if it had any merit prior.

Anyway, carry on. My take is not welcome in a "science" party. It Offends them. Imagine that.

Its to do with theory and proof. Theres plenty of theory and mathematical proofs for what i post, however see no testable theory of God, just wishful thinking and unbacked opinion, so ill stick with the testable evidence.. And correct, god is not welcome in my science threads, ive made that abundantly clear in the past. Thats why you have a Humanities section.

[UKSmartypants]

<<<removed>>>

what offends me are claims not backed by sound proof in the form of mathematical proofs, observation and repeatable experiments. You show us a repeatable experiment to prove god exists you quite welcome to post it here.

[Physics Hunter]

1. absolutely, its perfectly possible theres a parallel universe which is an exact copy (in terms of size energy etc) but with time runnig nbackwards, created the same moment of ours, in order to maintain zero balance.

2. I look forward to your theory on the 11 dimensional God who lives on the compactified Brane.

I don't need one. I know he exists, I can ask him later if the membrane crap is remotely right.

[UKSmartypants]

“All opinions are not equal. Some are a very great deal more robust, sophisticated and well supported in logic and argument than others.”
― Douglas Adams

[UKSmartypants]

Mathematics is based on assumptions.

Complete utter nonsense, and a wilful or purely ignorant observation of how maths works.

Maths is based on previous logical proofs

You start with 1+1=2 and once proven, use that to prove 2+2=4 and then 4+4=8- Nothing in maths is assumed unless previously proved. before your post even starts its based on a complete fallacy and lie.

Einstein believed this and asked, "How can it be that mathematics, being after all a product of human thought, which is independent of experience, is so admirably appropriate to the objects of reality?" One can 'prove' just about anything that they desire with mathematics.

yes, you can prove it with mathematics and logical proofs that are scrutinized and checked. But you can prove something either true or false. Your totally dishonest and deceitful statement is trying to imply maths is used to prove false things are true, which is never the case, because its all based on provable truths.

It is not used simply to test a hypothesis, but also and quite frequently, to substantiate one. Reality is not the all-encompassing purpose in atheistic cosmology. They even boast that is not. Openly, and arrogantly.

Experience has shown that God does exist. Life is a proof of the fact.

again its no proof of any such thing, show the causulaity and connection with repeatable observation and experimental proof. Of course you cant. its just a hypothesis.

Im sick of you god boys coming in here wreckage my science threads with off topic rants about your imaginary friend. last time the entire science forum was scrapped because of the crap you people post caused such a flame war. And this is going the same way. I nearly left this forum last time because of the insult of removing the science forum, whereas you people get away with trolling and off topicing my threads and just walk away, and thats down to poor partisan moderation. I put a lot of effort into providing interesting science content which i get a lot of thanks for. if you dont like my science threads then fuck off and dont read them, but stop trolling them

Why is it "christians" like you always turn out to be the biggest wankers?

[Trinnity]

FAIR WARNING

CWF is thread banned for off topic violating the no God or religion in Science forum.

Members are reminded to stay on topic.

Members are reminded to be civil no matter what, and obey the rules on civility.

If you want to tell someone to F off, you MUST use an emoji only.