Sew HER into an explosive vest, and set it off in an empty field.
She's a vile piece of crap who deserves to die.
Sew HER into an explosive vest, and set it off in an empty field.
She's a vile piece of crap who deserves to die.
Shamima Begum was aged 15. She Married a 23 year old Dutch ISIS fighter, she had to witness the severing of heads and execution and torture of dissenters. She lost two children, aged 8 months and 23 months and had a third child.
The UK Tory politicians, pursuing higher positions, including leadership, sought to induce good public image by playing to the people ... "vote for me and I will NOT allow Begum home to Britain"!!! "I will change the law to stop any person (A British person by the way) returning to Britain who has chosen to join ISIS"!!
Top Journalists vied for retrospective law to apply to Begum. She wanted an appeal case so the government stopped legal aid for her.
The principle of the Rule Of Law pushed to second place below electioneering?
If they disregard the law for this they can disregard the law for you and me.
I remember Michael Howard - a Tory Home Secretary - responsible for law/courts/Prisons/police - he was also directly responsible for the release of Life Sentence Prisoners convicted of Murder. Back then the Home Secretary controlled when a "Lifer" got out. (I was a senior manager in Home Office Lifer section and contributed to Parole board hearings on behalf of the Home Secretary) no matter the progress a prisoner made, risk low or high, good or bad - the Home Secretary made the decision on release.
Michael Howard was up for election... his mantra from the podium was - I quote: "vote for me, Myra Hindley will never be released"!!! (she being our most notorious vilest criminal in the system, with massive public hatred and media spin).
Politicians should not play with the rule of law.
Last edited by Dubler9; 06-12-2022 at 08:13 AM.
I read something a long time ago, can't remember when. It was an interview with some Yazidi (spelling?) women. In the interview the women stated that they feared their Muslim male captors; the rapes the treatment, but do you know what they feared more? They feared the wives of those Muslim men, they were terrified of them because they were worse than the men.
I don't care how old she was. She knew exactly what she was marrying, she knew exactly what the life was like. She stated that she had no problems with seeing severed heads (and this was AFTER her husband was killed and she was in the camp). She deserves everything that happens to her and so do others who CHOSE the same life she CHOSE. They should never be allowed to return to their countries of origin...EVER. Let her rot where she is.
Born too late to explore the world.
Born too early to explore the universe.
Born just in time to watch the collapse of the West.
While respecting your opinion, I wonder how you arrived at that opinion? If Ms Begum is worried about her head, she must have reason to worry. That means she is afraid of trial and punishment handed out in the country she chose to be part of. If she committed terrorist acts, or participated in the furtherment of terrorist acts in Syria, she should be handled by the Syrian system of justice. It would be the same even if she was still a British citizen, that is somewhat immaterial to her losing her head.
Is her "refugee camp" a prison, or is she simply hoping the Syrians don't have time to mess with little ol' Ms Begum?
If Ms Begum is a criminal responsible for terrorism, then why would anyone want her in their home country? Nothing like having a yet another terrorist to deal with! I can have sympathy for a Mom who has lost a child, or children. But a Mom who sews siucide vests deserves no sympathy whatsoever. I wonder if she is sad that her children died before being old enough to wear one of the vests she sewed for them?
I say let her face justice where she is. After all, that is the justice she fought for!
And this is not a "you are next" scenario. None of us went to Syria, to help Syrian rebels attempt to overthrow the government, and lost. We don't have to worry about any " next".
Brat (06-13-2022)
I’d let her back…when hell freezes over.
She is not just a former jihadi sympathizer, she is a jihadi an enemy of the western world. You don’t just turn that off, did the victims of the savages she supported and help get a chance for a do over. No they were savagely killed with her knowledge and participation, I’m sorry but you don’t get to say I was wrong my bad I wanna go home now. She wanted to go to Syria and play jihad, she is right where she belongs.
I am simply saying: When it comes to the rule of law we should not respect it when it favours only things/people we like and support.
The Dems under Prezzy Brandon are operating outside of the rule of law - simply because they despise Trump.
I don't give a flying fuck of shaminana
She can go rot in hell
She was an Isis breeding cow and nobody did force her to go there and fuck with terrorists. She did go because she wanted to go there. So stay there.
Last edited by Madison; 06-12-2022 at 02:21 PM.
Brat (06-13-2022)
My stance is not to do with liking her or her joining ISIS. My point is formed on the rule of law. She is a British citizen and should have returned to Britain. No one has asked that she not be put on trial. She can be tried in an English Crown Court and sentenced. This was the desire of those who support her return to England.
The Rule Of Law is so defined that your reason, intent, ideology, status etc will not push aside the offence you commit and the fair application of the law in all its tenets.
dinosaur (06-12-2022)
potlatch (06-12-2022)
I think I'll just log out for a while.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)