User Tag List

Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: Claim: Chinese Scientist Helps Create World’s First Genetically Edited Babies

  1. #1
    Banned Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsTagger First ClassSocialRecommendation Second ClassOverdrive1 year registered
    Overall activity: 99.3%

    Molly Pitcher's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Lansing, KS
    Thanked: 23,566
    Rep Power

    Claim: Chinese Scientist Helps Create World’s First Genetically Edited Babies

    HONG KONG (AP) — A Chinese researcher claims that he helped make the world’s first genetically edited babies — twin girls whose DNA he said he altered with a powerful new tool capable of rewriting the very blueprint of life.

    If true, it would be a profound leap of science and ethics.

    A U.S. scientist said he took part in the work in China, but this kind of gene editing is banned in the United States because the DNA changes can pass to future generations and it risks harming other genes.

    Many mainstream scientists think it’s too unsafe to try, and some denounced the Chinese report as human experimentation.

    The researcher, He Jiankui of Shenzhen, said he altered embryos for seven couples during fertility treatments, with one pregnancy resulting thus far. He said his goal was not to cure or prevent an inherited disease, but to try to bestow a trait that few people naturally have — an ability to resist possible future infection with HIV, the AIDS virus.

    He said the parents involved declined to be identified or interviewed, and he would not say where they live or where the work was done.

    There is no independent confirmation of He’s claim, and it has not been published in a journal, where it would be vetted by other experts. He revealed it Monday in Hong Kong to one of the organizers of an international conference on gene editing that is set to begin Tuesday, and earlier in exclusive interviews with The Associated Press.

    “I feel a strong responsibility that it’s not just to make a first, but also make it an example,” He told the AP. “Society will decide what to do next” in terms of allowing or forbidding such science.

    Some scientists were astounded to hear of the claim and strongly condemned it.

    It’s “unconscionable … an experiment on human beings that is not morally or ethically defensible,” said Dr. Kiran Musunuru, a University of Pennsylvania gene editing expert and editor of a genetics journal.

    “This is far too premature,” said Dr. Eric Topol, who heads the Scripps Research Translational Institute in California. “We’re dealing with the operating instructions of a human being. It’s a big deal.”

    However, one famed geneticist, Harvard University’s George Church, defended attempting gene editing for HIV, which he called “a major and growing public health threat.”

    “I think this is justifiable,” Church said of that goal.


  2. The Following User Says Thank You to Molly Pitcher For This Useful Post:

    Kris P Bacon (11-27-2018)

  3. #2
    Alumni Member & VIP V.I.P Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsTagger First ClassVeteranSocial
    Overall activity: 47.0%

    Retiredat50's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Thanked: 24,654
    Rep Power
    This is the wrong thing to do, they are going in the wrong direction.

    What they need to focus on is transferring a brain to a robot's/cyborg's body. This would solve all the LGBQXYZ problems, have a different body for each day. Wake up one day feeling like a woman, use the woman body, next day decide you are a house cat, use the cat body...

    Then everyone can be anything they want. The future will be glorious!

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to Retiredat50 For This Useful Post:

    Kris P Bacon (11-27-2018)

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts