User Tag List

Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: The EO That Trump Is Afraid To Rescind

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Overall activity: 32.0%

    Flanders's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    458
    Thanks
    820
    Thanked: 388
    Rep Power
    1507539

    The EO That Trump Is Afraid To Rescind

    There are always so many lies and misdirection in media talk about the economy I avoid posting economic messages until I find something to say that would challenge the economy horse manure artists put out year after year. Example:

    Repeal 50/50

    Every media and government economists inevitably find a way to justify burying private sector Americans deeper. Today’s editorial in Investor’s Business Daily is classic:


    Regulation: Getting rid of unneeded regulations may be the single-most effective spur to economic growth that's available to the federal government. Thankfully, unlike most recent presidents, President Trump is taking the job of cutting bad regulations seriously.


    XXXXX

    Still, the president seems to be pushing a minor revolution of sorts, as he repeals all sorts of rules that once impeded the economy.


    XXXXX

    If you count the nine months of regulations propagated by Trump vs. President Obama in 2016, it comes out to 2,183 rules put forward by Trump, compared with 2,686 rules for Obama, an 18% decrease. But even those numbers are deceptive, since many of Trump's new regulations are in fact getting rid of or freezing old regulations.


    XXXXX

    All told, CEI's top regulatory analyst Wayne Crews estimated that the economic cost of regulation to the economy is $2 trillion, or roughly 12% of current real U.S. GDP. That's $15,000 a year for every American family.

    It's an enormous tax — one most Americans don't even realize they're paying.


    Lots Of Presidents Talked About Getting Rid Of Bad Regulations — Trump Is Actually Doing It
    5:16 PM ET

    Lots Of Presidents Talked About Getting Rid Of Bad Regulations — Trump Is Actually Doing It | Stock News Stock Market Analysis - IBD

    In short: President Trump is full of shit. Proof: He flat refused to rescind DACA which is a clear burden on American taxpayers.


    Taxpayers in the United States will face a steep bill if the Trump administration signs legislation to extend legal status to so-called “Dreamers,” the illegal aliens who arrived as children and are now protected under the Obama-holdover unlawful executive order known as DACA.


    XXXXX

    The DREAM Act of 2017, the most likely vehicle for extending DACA protections and making them permanent, would raise federal outlays by $115 billion dollars, according to a Breitbart News analysis.


    Nightmare: DACA Amnesty DREAM Act Will Cost $115 Billion Thanks to Obamacare\

    Never mind rescind —— Trump would sign Obamacare-lite that contains so many taxes it should be called a budget bill.

    My title said “. . . Trump Is Afraid To Rescind” because I fear he does not want to rescind this one:

    Obama gave INTERPOL diplomatic immunity over American law enforcement:


    The White House released an Executive Order "Amending Executive Order 12425."

    http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-...ve-order-12425

    It grants INTERPOL (International Criminal Police Organization) a new level of full diplomatic immunity afforded to foreign embassies and select other "International Organizations" as set forth in the United States International Organizations Immunities Act of 1945.

    By removing language from President Reagan's 1983 Executive Order 12425, this international law enforcement body now operates—now operates—on American soil, its officers and property beyond the reach of our own top law enforcement arm, the FBI, and is immune from Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests. . . this immunity and protection—and elevation above the US Constitution—afforded INTERPOL is likely a precursor to the White House subjecting the United States under the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court (ICC). INTERPOL provides a significant enforcement function for the ICC, just as our FBI provides a significant function for our Department of Justice. . . Two critical matters are at play. One is an overall matter of sovereignty and the concept of the primacy of American laws above those of the rest of the world. But more recently a more overriding concern principally has been the potential—if not likely—specter of subjecting our Armed Forces to a hostile international body seeking war crimes prosecutions during the execution of an unpopular war. . .


    XXXXX

    In light of what we know and can observe, it is our logical conclusion that President Obama's Executive Order amending President Ronald Reagans' 1983 EO 12425 and placing INTERPOL above the United States Constitution and beyond the legal reach of our own top law enforcement is a precursor to more damaging moves.


    Wither Sovereignty
    Executive Order Amended to Immunize INTERPOL In America - Is The ICC Next?
    By Steve Schippert, Clyde Middleton December 23, 2009

    ThreatsWatch.Org: PrincipalAnalysis: Wither Sovereignty

    Note that Americans pay for INTERPOL’s dubious services. Worse still, INTERPOL is doing the dirty work for the United Nations with the taxes Americans pay to fund that foul ORGANIZATION.

    For years, I have been saying that the EPA is a UN bureaucracy. Now that the relationship between INTERPOL and the UN is less obscure than it was in the past, Obama’s reasons for inviting INTERPOL into this country are obvious. INTERPOL is here to oblige everything environmental freakazoids in organizations like Global E-Waste Crime Group want to label a crime.

    And what the hell is a Global E-Waste Crime Group in the first place? The name sounds like Dick Tracy’s Crimestoppers from the old comic strip. It is certainly not crime as Americans understand crime, but it is crime as defined by America’s enemies. Inevitably, so-called environmental crimes will be tried in the U.N.’s judicial system. Boy, was that a surprise!

    In 2010 INTERPOL pledged war on “environmental crime” whatever the hell that is. Bolivia’s President Evo Morales, a bedbug in his own right, even called for prosecuting criminal “countries” in the U.N.’s International Criminal Court.

    So how come Trump cannot rescind Obama’s EO? As far as I know Trump never said a word about it. Maybe somebody should ask his favorite loser —— U.S. Ambassador to an ORGANIZATION —— Nikki Haley what she is doing to protect Americans from INTERPOL’s Nazi past?

    Should you research INTERPOL you will find this common error:


    INTERPOL was established in 1923, disbanded in 1938, and reconstituted in 1946. This excerpt from Barry Napier’s piece about INTERPOL working with Nazi Germany is frightening when you relate it to Obama’s Ready Reserve Corps (funded in Obamacare-lite):


    Interpol insisted it ‘went out of business’ during the Second World War, and repeatedly told Congress this. But, evidence showing the exact opposite was later provided! Also, a June 1940 Interpol document openly says that the ‘Prague Butcher’, Reinhard Heydrich, ran Interpol during the war. He is the one who ‘masterminded’ the ‘final solution’. He was appointed to head Interpol a few months after Interpol’s 1939 Convention in Berlin, by “the SS and chief of the German police, Heinrich Himmler”. As head of Interpol, he engineered details of the ‘final solution’, with Interpol heads and leading Nazis, including Adolph Eichmann.

    NOTE: I want to make it clear that I see Communists and Nazis as one and the same. I do not want to fall into the trap of appearing to favor Communists because I attack Nazis. The Nazi trap has been a mainstay of the Left since the 1930s. Here is the trap: Nazis are bad so Communists must be good.

    Obama could not gamble on controlling the FBI et al. when the going got tough. Obviously, everything Obama attempted required a command center. The U.N. is that command center. In addition he put machinery in place that will be there after he is gone. Unfortunately for Americans the United Nations and INTERPOL have grown closer in recent years.

    Note that INTERPOL is not officially a United Nations agency; nevertheless, Napier’s piece makes the connection:


    Talking about the UN-Interpol connection, Simon said: “This special arrangement gives both organisations broad opportunities to take part in discussions on matters of common interest”. What – like ruling the world? Sounds pretty much like the current UN-socialist agenda! And ‘The UN link, established in 1971, gave Interpol something else – added credibility. For an organization whose roots were planted, and flourished, in Nazi Germany, this was a major step forward.’ (The News American, March 18th, 1975).


    Changing the meaning of policing
    Interpol – Fascist Friends
    By Barry Napier Tuesday, January 12, 2010

    Interpol Fascist Friends

    Is Obama & Company starting to look like the reincarnation of long-dead Nazis?

    Obama left office with another International organization with diplomatic immunity operating in the United States with a mandate to bring the American people to global government as quickly as possible.

    In theory, INTERPOL avoids crimes that deal with military, racial, religious, and political matters. Environmental garbage is political. So why is INTERPOL involving itself in the U.N.’s environmental agenda? Answer: Now that the global warming fraud has been exposed the UN is looking for new territory. Turning to INTERPOL to “criminalize” opposition to environmental frauds is the obvious choice. Interestingly, global warming freakazoids never got INTERPOL’s help until 2010:



    Interpol President Khoo Boon Hui addresses the opening of the 79th session of the Interpol General Assembly in Doha. Interpol on Monday adopted a resolution unanimously pledging support to back the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES) and to fight environmental crime.


    Interpol pledges war on environmental crime
    Mon Nov 8, 3:28 pm ET

    http://www.physorg.com/news/2010-11-...tal-crime.html

    Broadening INTERPOL’s authority is a step towards trials in the UN’s International Criminal Court.

    Add up the train wrecks Obama & Company got away with the proverbial straw that breaks the camel’s back will have to be the size of a giant redwood tree to break the U.N.’s back.

    If President Trump, the media, and the Congress, continue to ignore INTERPOL’s newly acquired status in this country they are either blind, or in full agreement with Obama. INTERPOL diplomatic immunity left in place is the preview of a certain future. The day will come when the American people wake up in chains and ask themselves “How did this happen?” Answer: Everything the United Nations stands for.
    Last edited by Flanders; 10-03-2017 at 09:30 AM.
    FLANDERS

    The basic test of freedom is perhaps less in what we are free to do than in what we are free not to do. It is the freedom to refrain, withdraw and abstain which makes a totalitarian regime impossible. Eric Hoffer

  2. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Flanders For This Useful Post:

    Big Dummy (10-03-2017),HawkTheSlayer (10-03-2017),Quark (10-03-2017)

  3. #2
    Alumni Member & VIP V.I.P
    Overall activity: 61.0%

    RMNIXON's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    24,856
    Thanks
    11,595
    Thanked: 23,622
    Blog Entries
    2
    Rep Power
    21474865
    Rather long winded, but yes DACA has serious long term economic consequences.

    To begin with even those DACA recipients who are valuable to the economy are still taking jobs otherwise available to record numbers of unemployed or under-employed Americans. And a fraction paying taxes while they send large sums of money back to Mexico and Central America does not cover the enormous welfare and other public benefit costs for all these people

    It has also been pointed out by an immigration expert on Fox that if DACA proceed to their goal of some form of Amnesty Citizenship then they will all qualify to sponsor chain migration of other family members. In just a few short years we could see the original DACA numbers multiply and you can bet most of these people will be far from productive.
    "Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. We didn't pass it to our children in the bloodstream. It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them to do the same, or one day we will spend our sunset years telling our children and our children's children what it was once like in the United States where men were free."

    - Ronald Reagan

  4. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to RMNIXON For This Useful Post:

    Flanders (10-03-2017),HawkTheSlayer (10-03-2017)

  5. #3
    Senior Member
    Overall activity: 32.0%

    Flanders's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    458
    Thanks
    820
    Thanked: 388
    Rep Power
    1507539
    Quote Originally Posted by Flanders View Post
    There are always so many lies and misdirection in media talk about the economy I avoid posting economic messages until I find something to say that would challenge the economy horse manure artists put out year after year.

    Trump would sign Obamacare-lite that contains so many taxes it should be called a budget bill.
    Alternatives is the new bullshit word. Anything Trump does keeps the ACA on life support.

    Where does Trump say his plan REPEALS OBAMACARE?

    VIDEO ▼


    President Trump to sign an executive order on health care | On Air Videos | Fox News


    The White House announced Thursday that President Trump is taking executive action on health care as Congress stalls on efforts to overhaul ObamaCare, calling for a plan that could let employers band together and offer coverage across state lines.

    An executive order Trump plans to sign Thursday morning aims to offer “alternatives” to ObamaCare plans and increase competition to bring down costs.


    Trump clears way for ObamaCare 'alternatives' in new executive order, goes around stalled Congress

    Trump clears way for ObamaCare 'alternatives' in new executive order, goes around stalled Congress | Fox News

    In fact, everything Trump does with the big stuff is half-ass:

    1. The Affordable Care Act

    2. DACA.

    3. The Iran Nuclear Deal.

    4. The Wall.

    5. Hillary Clinton.

    6. Tax cuts.


    VIDEO ▼

    Video | Special Report | Bret Baier | Fox News Channel

    NOTE: Repealing the XVI Amendment is the only tax cut that helps the American people.
    FLANDERS

    The basic test of freedom is perhaps less in what we are free to do than in what we are free not to do. It is the freedom to refrain, withdraw and abstain which makes a totalitarian regime impossible. Eric Hoffer

  6. #4
    Senior Member
    Overall activity: 32.0%

    Flanders's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    458
    Thanks
    820
    Thanked: 388
    Rep Power
    1507539
    Quote Originally Posted by Flanders View Post
    Alternatives is the new bullshit word. Anything Trump does keeps the ACA on life support.

    Where does Trump say his plan REPEALS OBAMACARE?
    This sounds good on the face of it:


    Earlier on Thursday, the president signed an executive he said was a step toward “saving the American people from the nightmare of Obamacare.”


    Trump will end ObamaCare subsidy payments
    By Joe Tacopino
    October 12, 2017 | 10:23pm

    Trump will end ObamaCare subsidy payments | New York Post

    As good as it looks I simply cannot see how it leads to fully repealing the ACA.

    Trump brags about rescinding Obama’s EOs; so what is preventing Trump from rescinding Executive Order 13524?


    By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including section 1 of the International Organizations Immunities Act (22 U.S.C. 288), and in order to extend the appropriate privileges, exemptions, and immunities to the International Criminal Police Organization (INTERPOL), it is hereby ordered that Executive Order 12425 of June 16, 1983, as amended, is further amended by deleting from the first sentence the words "except those provided by Section 2(c), Section 3, Section 4, Section 5, and Section 6 of that Act" and the semicolon that immediately precedes them.

    BARACK OBAMA

    The White House,

    December 16, 2009.

    Barack Obama: Executive Order 13524Amending Executive Order 12425 Designating Interpol as a Public International Organization Entitled To Enjoy Certain Privileges, Exemptions, and Immunities
    FLANDERS

    The basic test of freedom is perhaps less in what we are free to do than in what we are free not to do. It is the freedom to refrain, withdraw and abstain which makes a totalitarian regime impossible. Eric Hoffer

  7. #5
    Senior Member
    Overall activity: 32.0%

    Flanders's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    458
    Thanks
    820
    Thanked: 388
    Rep Power
    1507539
    UPDATE

    Trump cannot rescind these two, but he can sign an EO that overturns their propaganda value:


    The Government's environmentally related activities have grown up piecemeal over the years. The time has come to organize them rationally and systematically. As a major step in this direction, I am transmitting today two reorganization plans: one to establish an Environmental Protection Agency, and one to establish, within the Department of Commerce, a National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.


    Richard Nixon
    215 - Special Message to the Congress About Reorganization Plans To Establish the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
    July 9, 1970

    The EPA came first. The law that gave the EPA the authority to confiscate private property as well as hand fresh water and vast land areas to the United Nations followed the bureaucracy.

    Richard Nixon: Special Message to the Congress About Reorganization Plans To Establish the <B><font color='#cc3300'>Environmental Protection Agency</font></B> and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration


    1970-72: Created EPA which passed Clean Air Act

    The EPA subsequently passed its first piece of legislation, the Clean Air Act, in 1972.

    http://www.ontheissues.org/celeb/Ric...nvironment.htm

    NOTE: Nixon never intended the EPA to become what it is today, nor did he ever imagine the EPA would become a de facto United Nations agency.

    United Nations tree-huggers insist that the American people put American territory and natural resources into some sort of a Terra Firma Trust Fund (TFTF) for the Third World’s future use. I think it is called a Green Belt or Green Zone or something like that. It is supposed to run from Alaska down to the southern tip of South America. I have not heard much about the UN’s land grab lately, but to no one’s surprise, many well-known Hollywood luminaries were all for it — mainly to protect their own privacy in those sparsely populated areas in the Western United States they call home.

    Hollywood parasites should devote less time to handing down a pristine world and more time handing future generations secure property Rights.

    Harrison Ford brings star power to green issues American Morning - CNN.com Blogs

    XXXXX

    President Reagan promised to eliminate the UNCONSTITUTIONAL ED.

    Department of Education must be abolished


    Fourth, a Department of Education will save tax dollars. By eliminating bureaucratic layers, the reorganization will permit direct, substantial personnel reductions. By enhancing top-level management attention to education programs, it will earn improved educational services at less cost.

    Fifth, it will make Federal education programs more responsive. Placing education in a highly visible department of its own gives the American people a much clearer perspective on what the Federal Government is doing in education and who is responsible for these activities. It allows people to better decide what the Government should and should not be doing in education.

    Sixth, a Department of Education will ensure that local communities retain control of their schools and education programs. That is essential if our schools are to serve their students properly, and the Department of Education will, therefore, not permit the Federal Government to begin making decisions on education policy that are best made at the local level.


    Jimmy Carter
    Department of Education Organization Act Statement on Signing S. 210 Into Law.
    October 17, 1979

    Jimmy Carter: Department of Education Organization Act Statement on Signing S. 210 Into Law.

    NOTE: Unlike Nixon, Jimmy Peanuts knew exactly where the ED was going.
    FLANDERS

    The basic test of freedom is perhaps less in what we are free to do than in what we are free not to do. It is the freedom to refrain, withdraw and abstain which makes a totalitarian regime impossible. Eric Hoffer

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •