User Tag List

Page 10 of 10 FirstFirst ... 345678910
Results 91 to 99 of 99

Thread: House Intelligence committee meets on Russian meddling in our election

  1. #91
    Alumni Member & VIP V.I.P
    Overall activity: 58.0%

    2cent's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    12,531
    Thanks
    9,042
    Thanked: 9,763
    Rep Power
    21474852
    Quote Originally Posted by Calypso Jones View Post
    I don't consider myself out of the mainstream...i'm probably pretty average in my beliefs...they're the same as a LOT of my friends...especially women.

    So here goes.

    I don't trust comey.

    He's a liar, and he minces words.

    He knows more and he knows trump has done nothing with the Russians but the democrats Have.

    He is there to protect the democrats, especially the Clintons.
    My guess is that he's been "Clintoned". My other guess is that Trump knows that.
    When you are dead, you don't know that you are dead.
    It is difficult only for the others.
    It is the same when you are stupid.

  2. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to 2cent For This Useful Post:

    BORDLANGCULT (03-20-2017),Knightkore (03-21-2017),LongTermGuy (03-20-2017)

  3. #92
    Alumni Member & VIP V.I.P
    Overall activity: 23.0%

    Rita Marley's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Posts
    19,232
    Thanks
    23,490
    Thanked: 24,090
    Blog Entries
    2
    Rep Power
    21474858
    Quote Originally Posted by RobertLafollet View Post
    It would appear to be fake news as nobody backs it up.
    Not even themselves.

    We can walk away from this if the NY Times apologizes to the POTUS and the former president for incriminating them in a fake news story, and admit they are a fake news organization.

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to Rita Marley For This Useful Post:

    Knightkore (03-21-2017)

  5. #93
    In Trump we Trust
    Overall activity: 8.0%

    BORDLANGCULT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Posts
    1,787
    Thanks
    1,876
    Thanked: 1,923
    Rep Power
    2776945
    Quote Originally Posted by Rita Marley View Post
    Not even themselves.

    We can walk away from this if the NY Times apologizes to the POTUS and the former president for incriminating them in a fake news story, and admit they are a fake news organization.
    Exactly, Fake news must be taken to task. Suspend their right to "print" or distribute their drivel over the interwebs indefinitely.
    Another year older and deeper in debt, Thanks Obama!

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to BORDLANGCULT For This Useful Post:

    Knightkore (03-21-2017)

  7. #94
    V.I.P. V.I.P
    Overall activity: 99.6%

    nonsqtr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    10,841
    Thanks
    2,898
    Thanked: 8,169
    Rep Power
    21474850
    Quote Originally Posted by BORDLANGCULT View Post
    Exactly, Fake news must be taken to task. Suspend their right to "print" or distribute their drivel over the interwebs indefinitely.
    Violate the Constitution?

    No...


    The feds can regulate BANDWIDTH, because that is commerce. But they can't regulate content, even if it's fluff.

    No, I would say the civil suit is the way to go. Even if they win, they lose.

  8. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to nonsqtr For This Useful Post:

    2cent (03-20-2017),Knightkore (03-21-2017)

  9. #95
    Alumni Member & VIP V.I.P
    Overall activity: 58.0%

    2cent's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    12,531
    Thanks
    9,042
    Thanked: 9,763
    Rep Power
    21474852
    Quote Originally Posted by BORDLANGCULT View Post
    Exactly, Fake news must be taken to task. Suspend their right to "print" or distribute their drivel over the interwebs indefinitely.
    Please let's not call for the right of free speech to be taken from anyone. Next, it will be you or me.

    Instead, let's continue to either call them out for their lies, or let them know they're not being heard by simply ignoring them.
    When you are dead, you don't know that you are dead.
    It is difficult only for the others.
    It is the same when you are stupid.

  10. The Following User Says Thank You to 2cent For This Useful Post:

    Knightkore (03-21-2017)

  11. #96
    Alumni Member & VIP V.I.P
    Overall activity: 58.0%

    2cent's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    12,531
    Thanks
    9,042
    Thanked: 9,763
    Rep Power
    21474852
    Quote Originally Posted by nonsqtr View Post
    Violate the Constitution?

    No...


    The feds can regulate BANDWIDTH, because that is commerce. But they can't regulate content, even if it's fluff.

    No, I would say the civil suit is the way to go. Even if they win, they lose.
    Exactly. (Apparently, we were responding at the same time.)
    When you are dead, you don't know that you are dead.
    It is difficult only for the others.
    It is the same when you are stupid.

  12. The Following User Says Thank You to 2cent For This Useful Post:

    Knightkore (03-21-2017)

  13. #97
    Senior Member
    Overall activity: 1.0%

    OverDrive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    The lush Sonoran Desert
    Posts
    1,251
    Thanks
    511
    Thanked: 913
    Rep Power
    2472028
    Quote Originally Posted by Daily Bread View Post
    Tweet baby - Tweet

    Tweet, but Tweet "smart!"

  14. The Following User Says Thank You to OverDrive For This Useful Post:

    Knightkore (03-21-2017)

  15. #98
    In Trump we Trust
    Overall activity: 8.0%

    BORDLANGCULT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Posts
    1,787
    Thanks
    1,876
    Thanked: 1,923
    Rep Power
    2776945
    Quote Originally Posted by nonsqtr View Post
    Violate the Constitution?

    No...


    The feds can regulate BANDWIDTH, because that is commerce. But they can't regulate content, even if it's fluff.

    No, I would say the civil suit is the way to go. Even if they win, they lose.
    I disagree. It's gotten to the point where a blatant disregard for truth is being printed or passed off on the interwebs,

    MLK bust is gone from the oval office, for example. It may seem like a mild mannered mistake, but the "intention"

    of the fake news was to damage the POTUS image and draw more racial tension, not an insignificant matter.

    There are plenty more examples.
    Another year older and deeper in debt, Thanks Obama!

  16. The Following User Says Thank You to BORDLANGCULT For This Useful Post:

    Knightkore (03-21-2017)

  17. #99
    Alumni Member & VIP V.I.P
    Overall activity: 58.0%

    2cent's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    12,531
    Thanks
    9,042
    Thanked: 9,763
    Rep Power
    21474852
    Quote Originally Posted by BORDLANGCULT View Post
    I disagree. It's gotten to the point where a blatant disregard for truth is being printed or passed off on the interwebs,

    MLK bust is gone from the oval office, for example. It may seem like a mild mannered mistake, but the "intention"

    of the fake news was to damage the POTUS image and draw more racial tension, not an insignificant matter.

    There are plenty more examples.
    So call them out on it, then point and laugh.

    LOUDLY!

    Does it occur to you that government control of the press is exactly what they're ultimate goal is? And to obtain that goal, they're creating the very situation that would have the very people who would otherwise be railing against it vociferously, calling in FAVOR of it?


    Don't fall for it!
    When you are dead, you don't know that you are dead.
    It is difficult only for the others.
    It is the same when you are stupid.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •