User Tag List

Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: President rules out Dem UBC bill

  1. #1
    Administrator V.I.P
    TPF Moderator
    Achievements:
    SocialTagger First ClassOverdrive50000 Experience PointsRecommendation First ClassVeteranCreated Blog entry
    Overall activity: 99.8%

    Calypso Jones's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    71,859
    Thanks
    5,540
    Thanked: 75,770
    Rep Power
    21474914

    President rules out Dem UBC bill

    Report: Trump rules out Democrats’ universal background checks bill

    AllahpunditPosted at 6:01 pm on September 17, 2019




    Not a surprise, but it’s interesting that POTUS dawdled on this for weeks after the El Paso and Dayton massacres — until Beto O’Rourke went “Leeroy Jenkins” on gun confiscation at last week’s debate. Was that a coincidence or did Beto’s stunt spook Trump into taking the Democrats’ biggest gun-control “ask” off the table?


    President Donald Trump will not consider the House-passed universal background checks bill as part of his proposed gun package, according to a source familiar with the conversation on guns…
    “The things that they are proposing just aren’t realistic and they know that and so it’s designed more to talk to their political base and it’s a lot more about that than I think an actual solution,” [John] Thune said…

    While Trump will not support the House-passed universal background checks bill, he could still back a more limited form of background check legislation as well as so-called red flag laws. Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), who is working on a red flag bill with Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) said that background checks and red flag bills should go hand in hand.
    The likely reality is that Trump intended all along to take UBCs off the table and was waiting for an opportune moment, which O’Rourke, bless his heart, kindly provided. Pat Toomey sighs a weary sigh:





    • "The real bombshell": CBS News hits NYT over Kavanaugh story to focus on witness tampering
      Republicans say the political momentum within their party to expand background checks suffered a blow last week when Democratic presidential candidate Beto O’Rourke declared, “hell yes, we’re going to take your AR-15s, your AK-47s” at Thursday’s primary debate…







    “This rhetoric undermines and hurts bipartisan efforts to actually make progress on commonsense gun safety efforts, like expanding background checks,” Toomey, who has been at the center of Senate negotiations, warned Friday.
    There are three “tiers” of background-check reforms kicking around in Congress. One is the Democrats’ UBC bill, the proverbial full enchilada that would require background checks for online sales, gun-show sales, *and private sales*. That’s now been ruled out by the White House if you believe Politico. The next tier is the Toomey/Manchin bill from 2013, which has been momentarily revived. That would require checks for online and gun-show sales but would leave the exemption for private sales in place. The odds of Trump endorsing that don’t seem so hot either. The lowest tier is legislation that would tighten enforcement of existing background checks, with the White House reportedly considering a smartphone app that would allow private sellers to access the federal background check database remotely before a sale to see if the seller has been flagged. Manchin calls the idea “crazy,” and it seems to me self-defeating if the White House is intent on maintaining the exemption for private sales. If and when an app is in place that makes it convenient for private sellers to run checks themselves, it’ll be that much easier for Democrats to agitate to make those checks mandatory by law.

    Whatever happens, there’s a lot of mental energy being expended right now on token legislation which no one believes will meaningfully reduce the rate of mass shootings!

    Red-flag laws remain the most interesting possibility still on the table, and Trump might be susceptible to having his arm twisted on that since his buddy Lindsey Graham is co-writing the main bill in the Senate. If nothing ends up passing now though, it surely means that no new gun control will pass before the election. It’d be insane for Trump to hold off on signing anything a year out from Election Day and then panic six months from now, after another massacre somewhere. Righties would be much more demoralized to see him cave with the election so close than they’d be if he caved now. The best time to pass something if he’s inclined that way is ASAP and then use the next year to hammer gun-rights supporters with arguments against protesting by staying home on Election Day — “socialism must be stopped,” “gun control under a Democratic administration will be 10 times more draconian,” and so on. If Trump says no to reform this fall, he’s essentially gambling that nothing catastrophic will happen over the next year that ends up galvanizing an electoral push on gun control. That’s a reasonably safe gamble — public backlashes to gun rights after major violence are famously fleeting — but not completely riskless. To put all of that another way, if Trump’s willing to do anything on background checks *at any point*, the time to do it is now.

    Here’s McConnell today reiterating his view of this subject, that Senate Republicans aren’t sticking their necks out a centimeter on gun control until they know what the president does and doesn’t support. There’s no way he’s going to force vulnerable incumbents like Cory Gardner and Susan Collins out onto a limb by asking them to take a position on a controversial bill and then have Trump saw that limb off by declaring, “Nah, I’m not signing anything.”
    Sarah Sanders doesn't often mop the White House Press Corp Floor...but when she does, she uses Jim Acosta.

    There is no American free press. They're bought and paid for.

    “Muslim brotherhood & planet of the apes had a baby=vj.”

    The Devil whispered in Trumps ear and said,
    "you're not strong enough to withstand the storm".
    President Trump whispered back,"I am The Storm"!

  2. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Calypso Jones For This Useful Post:

    Big Dummy (09-17-2019),Conservative Libertarian (09-18-2019),HawkTheSlayer (09-17-2019),Lone Gunman (09-17-2019),NORAD (09-17-2019),Old Ridge Runner (09-18-2019),Quark (09-17-2019)

  3. #2
    Sr ADMIN/Founder IT Staff
    Forum Donor
    V.I.P
    TPF Moderator
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation First ClassTagger First ClassOverdrive50000 Experience PointsCreated Album picturesVeteran
    Overall activity: 99.6%

    Trinnity's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    58,343
    Thanks
    8,120
    Thanked: 50,011
    Rep Power
    21474901
    He's always messing with them. lol

  4. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Trinnity For This Useful Post:

    Conservative Libertarian (09-18-2019),JMWinPR (09-18-2019),Lone Gunman (09-17-2019),NORAD (09-17-2019),Old Ridge Runner (09-18-2019)

  5. #3
    Alumni Member V.I.P Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsSocialTagger First ClassCreated Blog entryVeteran
    Overall activity: 47.0%

    Quark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Posts
    25,469
    Thanks
    49,919
    Thanked: 21,512
    Rep Power
    21474866
    Interesting.

    As Yogi Berra use to say, "It ain't over until its over." Universal background checks is not going to stop Left-wing nuts from mass murder. No one can buy a modern center fire firearm online now so background checks is useless for so-called online sales. I don't remember of one mass murder being done by a private sale firearm.

    As to red flag laws the only purpose of red flag laws is to deny God-fearing law abiding Americans their right to own a firearm. Red flag laws will be used by the Communist Democrats against God-fearing law abiding Americans to disarm said Americans. A Communist State cannot be implemented by the Communists as long as Americans are armed to the teeth.

    If we can forestall additional gun control laws now then when President Trump is re-elected those laws can be implemented as President Trump will have nothing to lose. Look for more gun control laws whether we like it or not.

  6. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Quark For This Useful Post:

    Big Dummy (09-17-2019),Conservative Libertarian (09-18-2019),JMWinPR (09-18-2019)

  7. #4
    Stalking Santa in 2019 V.I.P Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsCreated Blog entryTagger First ClassSocialVeteran
    Overall activity: 37.0%

    NORAD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Posts
    9,080
    Thanks
    31,517
    Thanked: 8,311
    Rep Power
    21474850
    Love it!!


  8. #5
    Alumni Member & VIP V.I.P Achievements:
    Social50000 Experience PointsCreated Blog entryVeteran
    Overall activity: 30.0%

    Old Ridge Runner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Posts
    12,382
    Thanks
    47,396
    Thanked: 8,327
    Rep Power
    21474854
    Write you congress critter and tell them what has to be done on gun control, 1) enforce all current laws on the books; 2) longer sentences for repeat offenders with firearms convictions; 3) people with mental illness placed in the Instant background check system. Than after all of this is done create new laws if needed.
    Humble yourself, for there is an enormous change coming.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •