User Tag List

Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: States sue to block 1st Amendment rights as unconstitutional

  1. #1
    Alumni Member V.I.P Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsTagger First ClassSocialRecommendation Second ClassOverdrive1 year registered
    Awards:
    Master Tagger
    Overall activity: 12.0%

    Molly Pitcher's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Location
    Lansing, KS
    Posts
    10,813
    Thanks
    22,657
    Thanked: 19,212
    Rep Power
    21474849

    States sue to block 1st Amendment rights as unconstitutional

    Proof that progressive politics now defines education is walking the halls of justice and Congress. Disinformation regarding our founding documents has reached the point that 20 states are crying “foul” because the Trump administration is enforcing First Amendment rights.


    Say again?

    The ultimate in upside-down reasoning now stands before district courts across the United States. New York to California and 18 states in-between have filed lawsuits claiming that Department of Health and Human Services rules protecting healthcare professionals’ religious beliefs are unconstitutional.



    This is no joke. These states are enraged that the Trump Administration has made accommodation for doctors, nurses and other clinicians to decline participating in taking the life of a baby (unborn and upon delivery as New York and Vermont have approved).


    At the last reading of the First Amendment, it was clear that government is restricted from imposing religious practices upon citizens or “prohibiting the free exercise thereof.” The only instance where government can weigh-in on the latter is if the religious practice is harmful, injures or violates others’ freedom. The burden of proof is on the government and the bar is set high.


    In the multiple suits filed, the states claim that healthcare providers who have sincerely held religious beliefs have no right to adhere to them, that they must perform abortions and other life-ending procedures if asked or ordered. The states are essentially claiming that observing their faith is unconstitutional when the states are themselves breaching the Constitution by compelling medical professionals to perform homicidal acts.


    The underlying question that should be asked of legislators and states’ attorneys is when did government become the arbiter of death, infanticide in particular? Whatever happened to “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness?”






    It doesn’t take a rocket scientist (or does it?) to understand that the House of Representatives’ democrat leadership has usurped the power of life and death by impeding a vote on a bill that stops the killing of babies born alive (abortion on delivery) for the 50th time. They are going a step further by introducing a bill that would attempt to overturn state laws in Alabama, Georgia and other republics (be reminded that each state had to become a constitutional republic before voted entry in the USA), pitting the federal government against states’ rights as protected by the 10th Amendment.


    Democrats are working to inflict their death-cult policies on every citizen of the nation, expecting to outlaw individual freedoms and states’ autonomy with federal legislation. The purpose of the Constitution was and is to restrain exactly this kind of smug, arrogant overreach by representatives of districts who believe their small constituency has greater authority than a president who properly won his office in a national election. (The last point was confirmed after the completion of four investigations.)


    Despite appointed district judges, who also erroneously believe they have supremacy over the office of President, ruling according to whim and not duly enacted law, the voting majority will not stomach continued murder of their children. Science dispels the fallacy that fetuses are not viable or even human before birth. Nor does science support the killing of a child after delivery. Only satanism approves that practice.



    Defending the First Amendment right of individuals to opt-out of murder is not a denial of healthcare to a woman, it is the preservation of life and health to a child as codified in Amendment Five: “No person shall be… deprived of life, liberty, or property…”


    Efforts to strip both healthcare professionals and the innocent unborn or just-born of their rights to life, liberty, property and the pursuit of happiness, is unconstitutional and any argument going before a court attempting to make that case is frivolous and should be thrown out.


    Aren’t these people bringing these baseless lawsuits the same ones that expect dog owners to accommodate muslims who move into their community and demand that dogs and all evidence of their existence disappear from sight? The same mentality is at play. Destroy the defenseless baby (or dog) so pregnant women (or muslims) aren’t offended by their presence.


    Actually, this is indeed a joke. Pathetic, dehumanizing and criminal, but not funny.


    https://canadafreepress.com/article/...constitutional


  2. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Molly Pitcher For This Useful Post:

    Big Dummy (05-28-2019),DLLS (05-28-2019),Hillofbeans (05-28-2019),Jim Scott (05-28-2019),jirqoadai (05-28-2019),Lone Gunman (05-28-2019),Rita Marley (05-28-2019)

  3. #2
    Senior Member Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsTagger Second Class1 year registered
    Overall activity: 21.0%

    Wilson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Location
    Near enough to a city to visit, far enough to be left alone
    Posts
    544
    Thanks
    157
    Thanked: 821
    Rep Power
    2480269
    Its not surprising. For progressives, nothing is as important as the ability to kill babies.

  4. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Wilson For This Useful Post:

    Lone Gunman (05-28-2019),Molly Pitcher (05-28-2019),Rickity Plumber (05-28-2019)

  5. #3
    Senior Member Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsTagger Second Class1 year registered
    Overall activity: 11.0%

    DLLS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Posts
    5,111
    Thanks
    1,236
    Thanked: 7,049
    Rep Power
    9724937
    Hey Winston you wanna go ahead and toss that old constitution down the memory hole?
    Regarding my avatar: I am the one on your left as you view it

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to DLLS For This Useful Post:

    Lone Gunman (05-28-2019)

  7. #4
    Alumni Member & VIP V.I.P Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsTagger Second ClassSocialVeteran
    Overall activity: 56.0%

    Big Dummy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Posts
    20,488
    Thanks
    44,024
    Thanked: 27,820
    Rep Power
    21474860
    This leads the way for hospitals to fire Christian healthcare workers. Then be muslim/satanist staffed completely.


    The need for Christian private hospitals will expand. But will the Christian hospitals accept all insurance or will progressive aligned insurances block use at Christian hospitals?
    Last edited by Big Dummy; 05-28-2019 at 09:28 PM.
    I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than those attending too small a degree of it. — THOMAS JEFFERSON (1791)

  8. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Big Dummy For This Useful Post:

    Lone Gunman (05-28-2019),Molly Pitcher (05-28-2019)

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •