User Tag List

Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: How Controlling Pop Culture Helps The Left Dominate Abortion Debates

  1. #1
    V.I.P. V.I.P Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsTagger First ClassSocialRecommendation Second ClassOverdrive1 year registered
    Awards:
    Master Tagger
    Overall activity: 99.0%

    Molly Pitcher's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Location
    Prairie Village, KS
    Posts
    9,095
    Thanks
    19,612
    Thanked: 15,472
    Rep Power
    21474847

    How Controlling Pop Culture Helps The Left Dominate Abortion Debates

    New pro-life laws in Georgia and Alabama have elicited predictable responses from pro-abortion activists. Framing the pro-life argument as an attack on women, Alyssa Milano suggested a sex strike, while Linda Sarsour was quick to blame white women for supporting the patriarchy.


    With the left’s sacrament of the left under fire, pro-abortion women are trotting out the same old tired arguments, ignoring the reality that millions of women are pro-life, including Gov. Kay Ivey, who signed Alabama’s bill into law. On “The View,” Meghan McCain, one of the few pro-life voices in media,said “[Pro-life] women like me are always left out of the conversation.” Millions of pro-life women seem to be invisible in abortion debates, or worse, they’re labeled “problematic.

    So why are millions of women who don’t see abortion as women’s salvation continually ignored? As I explain in my book, “The Anti-Mary Exposed: Rescuing the Culture from Toxic Femininity,” by and large, elite leftist women control the cultural dialogue in this country. The “sisterhood,” or the matriarchy (and the men who march lockstep with them), have a chokehold on all our main cultural currents: the fashion industry, politics, Hollywood, pop music, magazines, book publishing, and the universities. There is scarcely any room for pro-life ideas to seep into the discussion.


    This is by design. The matriarchy has acquired a virtual stranglehold on women’s attention, which is why, every January, the March for Life never gets real coverage, only a handful of pro-life women are household names, and details like the risks associated with abortion are scarcely reported.


    The sad reality, however, is that pro-lifers haven’t taken these leftist tactics seriously, particularly about how many women absorb the news. Frequently, we make beautifully, well-reasoned arguments, but then the left will get a celebrity to chime in on flashy news shows and the pages of magazines, and our arguments don’t see the light of day. We saw this in in the stem-cell debate that allocated billions of dollars to develop the unethical use of fetal stem cells from aborted babies instead of adult stem cells (that have proven to actually be successful).


    We made arguments, and they trotted out Christopher Reeve and Michael J. Fox. The push for gay marriage and gay adoption followed the same course. We make well-reasoned arguments based on logic and the common good, and they present Ellen Degeneres and her same-sex partner, or Elton John and his partner. They use symbols like pink hats, pink tennis shoes, and wire hangers as visual sound bites.

    Magazines have huge potential to engage passively pro-abortion women with visually stunning products. Blogger Glenn Reynolds has been lobbying for years for social conservatives to buy a major magazine. In an autopsy of Mitt Romney’s presidential campaign, Reynolds wrote, “Buy some women’s magazines. No, really. Or at least some women’s web sites. One of the groups with whom Romney did worst was female ‘low-information voters.’ Those are women who don’t really follow politics, and vote based on a vague sense of who’s mean and who’s nice, who’s cool and who’s uncool.”


    As a result, pro-lifers have no chance at swaying these women because we aren’t even in the debate, having settled to remain a caricature in the left’s imagination.


    Engaging women the way secular magazines do has the potential to go a long way. Presenting content directed at the many facets of women’s lives—from health, faith, fashion, fitness, travel, and politics—from a pro-life perspective currently doesn’t exist on a broad scale. We have simply settled with letting women (all women, including pro-lifers) get this content from the left.


    Naysayers will say we can’t beat the matriarchy at its own game. Perhaps they are right. But for too long, we have let them run roughshod over women, including women who could and should be pro-life. Our well-reasoned arguments are important and compelling, but we have to do more than expect them to be read by wider audiences. We must go out and meet women where the real debate is.


    https://thefederalist.com/2019/05/20...f5db0-84029677

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to Molly Pitcher For This Useful Post:

    Knightkore (05-20-2019)

  3. #2
    Alumni Member and VIP V.I.P Achievements:
    Your first GroupSocial50000 Experience PointsCreated Album picturesTagger First ClassVeteran
    Overall activity: 99.5%

    Knightkore's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Location
    Timey-Wimey Wibbly-Wobbly Blue Box Thingy
    Posts
    29,887
    Thanks
    92,522
    Thanked: 28,618
    Rep Power
    21474869
    Quote Originally Posted by Molly Pitcher View Post
    New pro-life laws in Georgia and Alabama have elicited predictable responses from pro-abortion activists. Framing the pro-life argument as an attack on women, Alyssa Milano suggested a sex strike, while Linda Sarsour was quick to blame white women for supporting the patriarchy.


    With the left’s sacrament of the left under fire, pro-abortion women are trotting out the same old tired arguments, ignoring the reality that millions of women are pro-life, including Gov. Kay Ivey, who signed Alabama’s bill into law. On “The View,” Meghan McCain, one of the few pro-life voices in media,said “[Pro-life] women like me are always left out of the conversation.” Millions of pro-life women seem to be invisible in abortion debates, or worse, they’re labeled “problematic.

    So why are millions of women who don’t see abortion as women’s salvation continually ignored? As I explain in my book, “The Anti-Mary Exposed: Rescuing the Culture from Toxic Femininity,” by and large, elite leftist women control the cultural dialogue in this country. The “sisterhood,” or the matriarchy (and the men who march lockstep with them), have a chokehold on all our main cultural currents: the fashion industry, politics, Hollywood, pop music, magazines, book publishing, and the universities. There is scarcely any room for pro-life ideas to seep into the discussion.


    This is by design. The matriarchy has acquired a virtual stranglehold on women’s attention, which is why, every January, the March for Life never gets real coverage, only a handful of pro-life women are household names, and details like the risks associated with abortion are scarcely reported.


    The sad reality, however, is that pro-lifers haven’t taken these leftist tactics seriously, particularly about how many women absorb the news. Frequently, we make beautifully, well-reasoned arguments, but then the left will get a celebrity to chime in on flashy news shows and the pages of magazines, and our arguments don’t see the light of day. We saw this in in the stem-cell debate that allocated billions of dollars to develop the unethical use of fetal stem cells from aborted babies instead of adult stem cells (that have proven to actually be successful).


    We made arguments, and they trotted out Christopher Reeve and Michael J. Fox. The push for gay marriage and gay adoption followed the same course. We make well-reasoned arguments based on logic and the common good, and they present Ellen Degeneres and her same-sex partner, or Elton John and his partner. They use symbols like pink hats, pink tennis shoes, and wire hangers as visual sound bites.

    Magazines have huge potential to engage passively pro-abortion women with visually stunning products. Blogger Glenn Reynolds has been lobbying for years for social conservatives to buy a major magazine. In an autopsy of Mitt Romney’s presidential campaign, Reynolds wrote, “Buy some women’s magazines. No, really. Or at least some women’s web sites. One of the groups with whom Romney did worst was female ‘low-information voters.’ Those are women who don’t really follow politics, and vote based on a vague sense of who’s mean and who’s nice, who’s cool and who’s uncool.”


    As a result, pro-lifers have no chance at swaying these women because we aren’t even in the debate, having settled to remain a caricature in the left’s imagination.


    Engaging women the way secular magazines do has the potential to go a long way. Presenting content directed at the many facets of women’s lives—from health, faith, fashion, fitness, travel, and politics—from a pro-life perspective currently doesn’t exist on a broad scale. We have simply settled with letting women (all women, including pro-lifers) get this content from the left.


    Naysayers will say we can’t beat the matriarchy at its own game. Perhaps they are right. But for too long, we have let them run roughshod over women, including women who could and should be pro-life. Our well-reasoned arguments are important and compelling, but we have to do more than expect them to be read by wider audiences. We must go out and meet women where the real debate is.


    https://thefederalist.com/2019/05/20...f5db0-84029677
    We can continue making reasoned arguments but we need to start addressing FEELINGS. We have to start using feelings & language just as effectively as they do. Something I learned on Politix & Topix as well. We have to fight twice as hard as they do to make up ground.
    Last edited by Knightkore; 05-20-2019 at 11:34 AM.
    LGBT = Liberty Guns Bibles Trump / FDR = F Dem Racists

    Captain Cold
    : Make the plan, Execute the plan, Expect the plan to go off the rails, throw away the plan.

    Kenneth Copeland: "Sometimes you can tell what something is by what it isn't."

    "Don't do unto others if they ain't done unto you, because you might get done in doing it." — Fred Sanford



  4. The Following User Says Thank You to Knightkore For This Useful Post:

    Molly Pitcher (05-20-2019)

  5. #3
    Senior Member Achievements:
    Tagger Second Class50000 Experience Points1 year registered
    Overall activity: 6.0%

    Mr. Independent's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    556
    Thanks
    45
    Thanked: 188
    Rep Power
    1292792
    Quote Originally Posted by Knightkore View Post
    We can continue making reasoned arguments but we need to start addressing FEELINGS. We have to start using feelings & language just as effectively as they do. Something I learned on Politix & Topix as well. We have to fight twice as hard as they do to make up ground.
    I believe feelings are good.

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to Mr. Independent For This Useful Post:

    Knightkore (05-21-2019)

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •