User Tag List

Page 7 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567
Results 61 to 63 of 63

Thread: Ernie and random numbers

  1. #61
    Alumni Member & VIP V.I.P Achievements:
    Social50000 Experience PointsVeteranTagger First Class
    Overall activity: 62.0%

    nonsqtr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    22,304
    Thanks
    7,651
    Thanked: 20,633
    Rep Power
    21474864
    So in other words, relating all this to the op which is the whole point, let's say you got Ernie to generate 1e44 random numbers. I don't know how long that would take, probably a long time haha. But let's say you could do it.

    The quantum theory says, that after 1e44 samples your observed statistical distribution will be exactly perfect.

    However my claim is, it will be imperfect. You will see some deviations from Pure Randomness, and you will have to account for those. Most likely the accounting will occur on the basis of information and geometry.

    So, the testing in the OP which is being done to four or five orders of magnitude, is completely inadequate. It needs to be done to 44 orders of magnitude, not 4.

    But I mean, this is a wonderful thing, having machines which can finally do this.

    If my thinking is correct, geometry is information to. If you're dividing something into two parts, you're doing work. The work that you're doing ends up as a partition, which is to say geometry. A partition is the same thing when you divide a set, or when you choose a member from a set.

    This concept underlies the field of "information geometry". (Google Shun-Ichi Amari).

  2. #62
    Senior Member Achievements:
    50000 Experience Points3 months registered
    Overall activity: 71.0%

    BabyBoomer+'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Posts
    1,242
    Thanks
    61
    Thanked: 682
    Rep Power
    2701939
    Quote Originally Posted by nonsqtr View Post
    So in other words, relating all this to the op which is the whole point, let's say you got Ernie to generate 1e44 random numbers. I don't know how long that would take, probably a long time haha. But let's say you could do it.

    The quantum theory says, that after 1e44 samples your observed statistical distribution will be exactly perfect.

    However my claim is, it will be imperfect. You will see some deviations from Pure Randomness, and you will have to account for those. Most likely the accounting will occur on the basis of information and geometry.

    So, the testing in the OP which is being done to four or five orders of magnitude, is completely inadequate. It needs to be done to 44 orders of magnitude, not 4.

    But I mean, this is a wonderful thing, having machines which can finally do this.

    If my thinking is correct, geometry is information to. If you're dividing something into two parts, you're doing work. The work that you're doing ends up as a partition, which is to say geometry. A partition is the same thing when you divide a set, or when you choose a member from a set.

    This concept underlies the field of "information geometry". (Google Shun-Ichi Amari).
    Why? very very few things in physics require 44 orders of magnitude accuracy.

    Fine structure constant - 8 decimal places
    gauge coupling constant - 8 decimal places

    Quark masses - 4 decimal places (in MeV or GeV)
    CMK mixing angles (x4) - 2 decimal places
    W Z and Higs boson massess - 4 dec places max.
    Neutrino masses - 2 decimal places in eV
    Proton to Electron mass ratio - 10 dec places


    Fact is even on amicroscopic scale, not much needs more than 10 dcimal places, in Si units. why do you think you need 44 orders of magnitude to determine randomness. ERNIE's sample of 8.5 million numbers is easily statistically significant.

    This

    ERNIE's activities are also checked before and after each draw by the Government Actuary's Department (GAD), which performs four tests to check the machine is truly random:


    • Frequency – whether every possible character in each position of the Bond number appears as often as it should
    • Serial – this looks at how many times one digit follows another, e.g. how often does a 3 directly follow a 7
    • Poker – this looks at the number of times consecutively generated groups of characters contain: four identical characters, three of a kind, two pairs, one pair, all different
    • Correlation – this looks for correlation between characters in two different Bond positions over a series of Bond numbers


    ERNIE has never failed.


    This method passes every known mathematical method for evaluating randomness
    Last edited by BabyBoomer+; 03-13-2019 at 12:48 PM.

  3. #63
    Alumni Member & VIP V.I.P Achievements:
    Social50000 Experience PointsVeteranTagger First Class
    Overall activity: 62.0%

    nonsqtr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    22,304
    Thanks
    7,651
    Thanked: 20,633
    Rep Power
    21474864
    Regarding the question of heterogeneous entanglement:

    https://m.phys.org/news/2018-06-scie...antum-dot.html

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •