User Tag List

Page 15 of 15 FirstFirst ... 589101112131415
Results 141 to 147 of 147

Thread: Bible speaks to modern science

  1. #141
    Alumni Member Achievements:
    Social50000 Experience PointsCreated Blog entryTagger First ClassRecommendation Second ClassVeteran
    Overall activity: 67.0%

    Sled Dog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    45,065
    Thanks
    9,105
    Thanked: 30,029
    Blog Entries
    3
    Rep Power
    21474887
    [QUOTE=CWF;2026011]
    Quote Originally Posted by Sled Dog View Post
    No, actually a historical series of rational philosophers, from Democritus and culminating in Gallilleo, Newton, LaVoissieur, and other giants developed the scientific theory.
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    The reason I choose to thank you is because you seem to enjoy illuminating your disdain for God by strutting arrogantly (much like Obama on coke) on a science forum intending for everyone to think that you are stunningly smart rather than stunningly stupid.

    You did not invent science. In fact, considering the prejudice pouring from your posts, you do not even comprehend what science is purposed to be about. Attempting to use science in any form or discipline to disprove the existence of God results only in the display of ignorance handcuffed by vanity and self importance.

    Nor did I invent religious practices. I certainly did not invent God. God made us all. Even Stalin was made in the image of God. Satan himself was made by God, and was PERFECT too, until iniquity (lawlessness) was found in him, undoubtedly because of his beauty, his talent, his brightness, his intelligence and his power. Seized by his own vanity, his own strutting, those who unwittingly ( in many instances) follow him, claiming that God is imaginary, a sky pixie, are his ignorant and deceived disciples.

    Yes, this does belong on the SCIENCE FORUM. Science is to be about understanding, about truth. And a scientist does not spout twisted versions of the meaning of Biblical verse in order to support his won warped versions of science.
    Amazing.

    I did not invent science.

    Who could have guessed that?
    Freedom Takes "I Won't". - Eric Frank Russell

    We the People DID NOT vote in a majority Rodent Congress, they stole it via election fraud.

    1 out of 2x2x2x2x2x2x2x2x2x2x2x2x2x2x2x2x2x2x2x2x2x2

    = 1/4,194,304
    = "Heads, Always Heads, Heads Every Time"
    = "Rodents Cheating"

  2. #142
    Alumni Member & VIP V.I.P Achievements:
    Social50000 Experience PointsVeteranTagger First Class
    Overall activity: 7.0%

    nonsqtr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    22,646
    Thanks
    7,831
    Thanked: 21,193
    Rep Power
    21474864
    Quote Originally Posted by Shane Ryan View Post
    The real issue they have with Darwin is that he was a theist.
    The real issue that we have with Darwin is he didn't know about DNA.

    therefore he could not possibly have been precise in his description of evolution.

    Come to think of it, that's pretty much the same situation as these 3000 year old geezers who want to tell me how God works.

    They just didn't know a lot of stuff back three thousand years ago. God started out being capricious and Whimsical, remember?

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to nonsqtr For This Useful Post:

    Knightkore (01-15-2019)

  4. #143
    Alumni Member & VIP V.I.P Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsTagger First Class1 year registered
    Overall activity: 58.0%

    Morning Star's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Posts
    14,871
    Thanks
    4,434
    Thanked: 16,211
    Rep Power
    21474852
    Quote Originally Posted by Calypso Jones View Post
    well....really!! You espouse the basis of what is today's science allegedly and you haven't even read it??
    You would have me read the Wright brothers on aviation and flight dynamics?

    You see in science we have better explanations hundreds of years later, unlike your biblical science which hasn't been updated since Noah thought the valley his farm was on was the whole world, and his farm animals two of every animal on Earth.
    Last edited by Morning Star; 01-14-2019 at 10:32 AM.

  5. #144
    Senior Member Achievements:
    50000 Experience Points1 year registered
    Overall activity: 1.0%

    CWF's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    431
    Thanks
    101
    Thanked: 286
    Rep Power
    3141924
    Your avatar makes me think of Alice in Wonderland. The Chesire Cat.

    Can you stand on your head? Or is it so far up your butt that you can't seem to find it.

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to CWF For This Useful Post:

    Knightkore (01-15-2019)

  7. #145
    Alumni Member & VIP V.I.P Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsTagger First Class1 year registered
    Overall activity: 58.0%

    Morning Star's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Posts
    14,871
    Thanks
    4,434
    Thanked: 16,211
    Rep Power
    21474852
    Quote Originally Posted by CWF View Post
    Your avatar makes me think of Alice in Wonderland. The Chesire Cat.

    Can you stand on your head? Or is it so far up your butt that you can't seem to find it.
    I don't have a butt. I am a spirit.

  8. #146
    Senior Member Forum Donor Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsSocial1 year registeredTagger First Class
    Overall activity: 29.0%

    ChemEngineer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Posts
    3,622
    Thanks
    1,242
    Thanked: 3,476
    Rep Power
    15395537
    Quote Originally Posted by Calypso Jones View Post
    'Some' say the bible was written 'several hundred years ago' which is partially correct. New Testament was written about 2000 years ago and the Old Testament goes back to 1450 BC. However, scripture does support and in many cases, is the basis of scientific discoveries.

    Job 26:7 says 'He hangs the earth on nothing'. It wasn't until the astronauts were able to look back and take a picture of the beautiful blue planet hanging in space that we were able to see just how true this statement is. Job was written about 950BC. Isaiah 40:22 describes the earth as being a "circle, spherical or round." This is a far cry from the notion that the earth was flat, which was the predominant belief in Isaiah's time.

    Job 38:16 God asks, "Have you walked in the recesses (valleys) of the sea? Up to that time, it was assumed that the bottom of the sea was saucer shaped and devoid of geographical features. It wasn't until 1873 that a group of brit scientists discovered a trench in the ocean. Since that time we've learned that the bottom of the sea has hills, valleys and trenches. Galileo used Amos 9:6 where God 'calls for the water of the sea. He pours it out on the land." Amos predates the hydrological cycle by several centuries. In defending his scientific principles, Galileo, in a letter to Madam Christina said: "I think in the first place that it is very pious to say and prudent to affirm that the HOly Bible can never speak untruth--whenever its true meaning is understood."

    Psalm 102:25-26 says the earth 'will wear out like a garment," supporting the 2nd law of Thermodynamics, which says that things have a tendency to decay over time. It wasn't till 1850 that Rudolph (Julius Emanuel) Clausius discovered this principle.

    Hebrews 11:3 says that everything is composed of 'invisible things.' In 1897, J.J. Thompson discovered sub-atomic particles, electrons, and so was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 1906.

    In Job28:25, God asked Job if he was present "when he imparted weight to the wind.? Torricelli discovered that the wind did indeed have weight but that wasn't until 1643.

    Psalm 8:8 mentions 'paths in the sea." In the 1800s Matthew Maury, regarded by many as a major founder of modern oceanography, was a creationist and believed in the accuracy of the Bible. He came across this phrase and so discovered that there are indeed paths or currents in the sea, much like rivers, in the oceans. The Gulf Stream is a prime example of one of these paths.

    Ecclesiastes 1:6 gives wind directions as 'blowing toward the south, then turning toward the north, the wind continues swirling along on its circular courses". The airmen of WWII were the first to discover this principle. Look at any weather map of the US and you can see the Jet Stream coming from north to south and then back up again.

    Leviticus 17:11 says that "the life of the flesh is in the blood." In 1616, William Harvey discovered that the blood circulates in the human body. Genesis 17:1 specifies that circumcision take place on day 8 after birth . In 1935, Professor Henri Dam discovered two elements, vitamin k and prothrombin; both elements are necessary for proper blood clotting. Why be so specific about this date and procedure? Professor Dam discovered that it is only on the eighth day that the percentage of prothrombin escalates to 100 percent above normal. Without this blood clotting element the newborn would face the possibility of uncontrolled bleeding.

    The Bible is not a book of science but it's word has been used by scientists through the generations thus proving that this book is accurate when it speaks to these matters.
    As a side note, JJ Thompson's Nobel Prize was in physics, not peace.

    Science of the Bible

    As a chemical engineer, I understand, and subscribe to the tenets of the scientific method. If
    anything has given me an appreciation for the Profound Fortuitous Interdependencies* which make life possible, it is the objectivity engendered by my scientific background, coupled with common sense so often lacking in many well educated people. How anti-intellectual it is of the godless Left to denigrate Christians, often maliciously so. Calling Christians “fundies” and “believers in a flat earth” seems to give many people the perverse notion that they are erudite, and can consign Christians to the backwaters of ignorance. Just as Jesus overturned the tables of the money-changers in His Temple, so too is it my intention to overturn the tables of the intolerant Left with these personally written observations correlating science with its Creator.

    Genesis 1:1 In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.
    The Holy Bible was written more than 2000 years ago. In 1924, Edwin Hubble proved that the spiral nebula
    in the constellation Andromeda was a separate island universe, apart from the Milky Way. This extended the size and scale of our universe by many orders of magnitude. Then, after hearing Albert Einstein's theory of relativity, Georges Lemaître, an ordained Catholic priest, proposed the “primeval atom” in 1927 – in other words, the creation of the universe. This breathtaking advancement in scientific thinking came not from a pontificating atheist, claiming to have exclusive jurisdiction over truth and science, but rather from a devoted follower of the Creator of heaven and earth. Contrary to their pretensions, atheists do not possess the only key to discovery and knowledge.

    In 1929, Fred Hubble discovered the Red Shift, eliminating any doubt that Lemaitre was right and Einstein wrong. Einstein had said to Lemaître , "your mathematics is correct but your physics is abominable." This phenomenon, Red Shift, shows that some galaxies are moving away from us at greater speeds than others, and that such velocities are proportional to their distance.
    This gave strong corroboration to the Big Bang theory of creation. The residual heat predicted in 1927 by
    Lemaître, and derisively dismissed by Albert Einstein, was later confirmed by Arno Penzias and Robert
    Wilson who in 1965 discovered the residual background radiation which is a remnant of the Big Bang. Penzias and Wilson of course received the Nobel Prize for their discovery, which was accidental. The penning of Genesis 1:1 was not.

    Prior to Lemaître’s radical proposal, scientists believed that the universe was eternal, that it had always been as we see it today. An inherent aspect of the Steady State Universe is the assumption that matter is continuously being created, somewhere, somehow. This passed for science, until it was disproved in the 1965 Astrophysical Journal.



    So we see Twentieth Century confirmation of the profoundly deep science originally expressed in the first sentence of the first paragraph of the first book of the Bible, and scientifically advanced centuries later by
    a Catholic priest (A “Fundie”), before anyone else.
    Genesis 2:7 And the Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul.

    Genesis 3:19 In the sweat of thy face shalt thou eat bread, till thou return unto the ground; for out of it wast thou taken: for dust thou art, and unto dust shalt thou return.

    Modern chemistry could not have begun before 1802, when John Dalton formally provided experimental evidence that matter is composed of discrete atoms. Everything before this was mere speculation – guesswork.
    Nevertheless, it is clearly stated in Genesis that man is “formed of the dust of the ground”, which is to say, the same elements of carbon, oxygen, hydrogen, iron, nitrogen, etc, that we find in . . . dust of the ground,
    minerals.


    Genesis 2:19 And out of the ground the Lord God formed every beast of the field, and every foul of the air;


    The same elements which form humans also form animals everywhere. However, there is no
    Biblical reference to “a living soul” with respect to animals. Nor do animals have the capacity to worship
    and appreciate the spirituality and hope that is one of the premier hallmarks of mankind, and our supreme bequest.
    Genesis 6:11 The earth also was corrupt before God, and the earth was filled with violence.
    One would think that as a result of the disciplines and analyses and benefits of human enlightenment, mankind should have been able to eliminate corruption and violence so prevalent thousands of years ago. Today, we have tools of production and health and social enlightenment unimaginable when the book of Genesis was written.
    But the earth today is still full of corruption and violence. Cornucopias of goods and services have not
    satisfied mankind’s lust for more, nor have psychologists and sociologists resolved the complex issues that lead people into destructive behavior. With burgeoning prison populations, and monstrous
    acts of evil on the increase worldwide, there seems little hope that corruption and violence will ever be eradicated.

    Genesis 7:19 And the waters prevailed exceedingly upon the earth; and all the high hills, that were under the whole heaven, were covered.

    Although the North American Continent was unknown when the Bible was written, paleontologists confirm that the interior of North America was once covered by shallow seas. Fossil evidence from distant parts of the globe that were unknown to inhabitants of ancient Israel lends scientific confirmation to the Noachian Flood described in the most ancient book of science known to man, the Holy Bible. I do not pretend to know the length of the six "days" of creation.
    However it is abundantly clear to me that the Elegance of Everything and the insuperable statistics of
    abiogenesis1 and the Anthropic Principle2 are eternally inexplicable by any exclusively naturalistic method. To those with eyes, God’s Hand is clearly visible everywhere one looks.

    Exodus 3:14 I am hath sent me unto you.....

    John 9:58 Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily I say unto you, Before Abraham was, I am.

    The naturalistic, if you will, “scientific” approach to explaining how man and energy and matter and space originated is to examine what is observable, and formulate hypotheses and theories based on observation
    and reason. There is no scientific explanation for the origin of matter and energy and information at the Moment of Creation, the Singularity, and obviously no experiment can examine, much less confirm any hypothesis of what first happened to lead to us and everything we see.
    In contrast, God defies scientific explanation because He is outside its purview. If miracles were
    scientifically explicable, they would not be miracles. After all, God created the physical realm
    that is the subject of scientific inquiry and we are still desperately trying to understand that aspect of His handiwork.
    Had mere mortals written where God came from without divine inspiration, they surely could not have presented such an elegant explanation as “I am” – an explanation that suffices even two thousand years later. Where did God come from? "I am." The universe is not eternal, but God is.

    I have only a vague notion of how my computer works as I type this on it. Although I don’t know
    how it works, I do know that it is real and that it operates in a marvelous, almost magical way. I don’t need to understand things to believe in and use them.
    And how much more marvelous is my brain and yours than these primitive computers, not one of which designed, much less built itself.

    “Many people don’t realize that science basically involves assumptions and faith. Wonderful things
    in both science and religion come from our efforts based on observations, thoughtful assumptions, faith and logic. (With the findings of modern physics, it) seems extremely unlikely (that the existence of life and humanity are ) just accidental.” – Charles Townes, Nobel Laureate and Professor of Physics at UC Berkeley



    Job 26:7 He stretcheth out the north over the empty place, and hangeth the earth upon nothing.
    Has anyone the slightest doubt as to how “empty” the North Pole is? Nobody living in the Middle
    East could possibly have visited “the north” so as to confirm what was then being written. These immutable
    scientific truths – two here in a single sentence - were far too coincidental to be attributable to luck. No, they were divinely inspired, as were so many things in the Bible. The earth truly hangs “upon nothing”, as confirmed by countless photographs from satellites and space stations, not to mention men on the moon, and the north is indeed an “empty place” by any measure.
    Job 26:14 Lo, these are parts of his ways: but how little a portion is heard of him? but
    the thunder of his power who can understand?

    With all our wisdom, and all our science, and all our research, “who can understand” anything today.
    Ultimate scientific answers continue to elude us everywhere one looks, from the submicroscopic to the supermacroscopic ! The pretense is that all this magnificent science that we see and study arose from nothing, based solely on megatime and megauniverses. Insuperable statistical impossibilities are
    explained away with clever wordplay and nebulous theories – anything at all to deny the Hand of the Creator so evident to casual observers, of all educational backgrounds, and all nationalities, and all times. That is, except for those who will not see.

    "The larger the island of knowledge, the longer the shoreline of wonder." - Ralph W. Sockman

    Job 28:5 As for the earth, out of it cometh bread: and under it is turned up as it were fire.

    The molten iron core of the earth was inconceivable because it was not discoverable when this passage was written. “Under (earth) it is turned up as it were fire.”
    Ah, some may say, “But there were volcanoes even then.” True enough. But are not volcanoes both isolated and rare, and not so much “under” the earth as above it? The molten core of the earth accords far better with this passage. Their scientific agreement is not coincidental, but rather Divinely inspired and guided.

    Job 38:1,2 Then the Lord answered Job out of the whirlwind, and said Who is this that
    darkeneth counsel by words without knowledge?


    How often one hears words uttered without knowledge by pretenders of science and enlightenment.
    The Lord does not take foolishness lightly. Neither should we.

    ob 38:24 By what way is the light parted, which scattereth the east wind upon the earth?

    The most learned scientist of antiquity could not have imagined the depth of this question.
    When light is "parted" by a diffraction grating, it can be shown to act both as particles as well as waves. These combinations of properties are difficult to understand much less explain.
    And the prodigious amounts of energy transmitted by solar radiation does indeed scatter the wind upon the earth as it heats different substances at different rates. Job could not have offered an adequate answer to the question, along the lines of: "Discrete photons of light travel together as a wave until parted into disparate visible components by striking and reflecting from solid objects into our eyes, while other wavelengths give up their energy as they are absorbed by solids and water. Temperature differentials established by ambient sunlight striking dissimilar surfaces create 'the east wind' so
    described."


    Psalms 19:1 The heavens declare the glory of God; and the firmament sheweth his handywork.


    NASA maintains a website which is updated daily. Its purpose, however unintended, is to
    “declare the glory of God” and to “show his handiwork.”
    http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/astropix.html
    How remarkable that so repetitive and well known a phenomenon as sunset can delight people of all ages, and all times, and all civilizations. How much more delightful are the glories and handiworks seen in national parks and sightseeing attractions worldwide, so many of which could scarcely have been known by the Bible’s authors. Nor had the first telescope been invented 2000 years ago.
    How is it that the more deeply we have seen, the more handiwork we have seen? How is it?
    Psalms 118:24 This is the day the Lord hath made; We will rejoice and be glad in it.


    Twenty-first century medicine confirms the benefits of joyfulness for both our mental health as well as our physical health. "We scientists have found that doing a kindness produces the single most reliable momentary increase in well-being of any exercise we have tested." – Martin Seligman, psychologist, in his book, Flourish


    Psalms 139:14 I will praise thee; for I am fearfully and wonderfully made: marvelous are thy works; and that my soul knoweth right well.


    Mankind is indeed “fearfully and wonderfully made.” The sophistication of our construction begins
    at the atomic level with atoms that are one part in 1017 nucleus and the rest empty space. Then consider our DNA, which is 45 trillion times more compact and efficient at data storage than today’s sophisticated computer microchips.

    Our brains have the memory capacity of 100 billion megabytes, which far exceeds anything conceivably necessary from a “selection” point of view.


    Our optic nerves transmit information at 4 gigabaud per second, which is 71,000 times faster than a dial up modem, and 1,000 times faster than an ultra-high speed T-1 line for a computer.

    The human eye sees in exquisite detail, over about 13 orders of magnitude of light intensity.
    Although the eye is often said to be flawed in its design by Darwinists and atheists, I would very much like to see them replace a human eye with something better which they have designed and built from lab reagents.


    Our ears hear over 13 orders of magnitude in sound intensity. Even more amazing, the ears
    perform a Fourier Analysis. In other words, our eardrums receive a single wave function at the eardrum. Then they break down this single wave function into its constituent sounds. For example, at a concert, your ears hear drums, brass, violins, solo arias, and the person behind you coughing, only because this blended noise is separated inside your ear. If your eyes performed a similar function, they would break down white just as a prism does, into disparate pure colors.


    Finally, our two eyes enable us to discern distance (and relative size) by triangulation. Our
    brains automatically compute the angle of the object seen, and compute its approximate distance. Similarly, our two ears enable us to discern the direction from which noises emanate not only because we have two ears, but also because of the relatively slow speed of sound. A difference in the arrival time from one ear to another of one thousandth to one ten-thousandth of a second is
    sufficient to discern, so that we can tell generally where a sound originated. If sound were substantially
    faster, both our ears would hear the sound at about the same time, and we could not enjoy stereophonic music, nor tell where sounds came from.



    In His wisdom, God made these velocities profoundly useful to us (as well, of course, as many, many other physical constants besides). They did not "evolve" to such values. And should they have been substantially
    different, say reversed, no evolutionary "modification" could possibly compensate to give us what we now have.

    Biochemistry is so profoundly complex that we are only beginning to appreciate how “wonderfully” we are made. Human blood defies LeChatelier’s Principle, in that when one molecule of oxygen is adsorbed by a hemoglobin molecule, its affinity for oxygen grows, instead of diminishing. The second molecule increases the affinity for the third, and the third for the fourth.
    This is precisely the reverse of normal chemistry principles and experimental observations. Our bodies’
    powers of endurance and healing are absolutely astounding.

    The list of features of our wonderful construction begins with conception, continues through growth, and concludes with our spiritual transformations evidenced time and again by the scientific observations of such
    people as Elisabeth Kubler-Ross. Dr. Kubler-Ross documented hundreds of instances of scientific evidence of a spiritual nature. She convincingly testified that she could not be persuaded of any naturalistic (scientific) explanation for it.

    Proverbs 3:20 By his knowledge the depths are broken up, and the clouds drop down the dew.

    Not only does the mid-Atlantic ridge constitute the continuing breakup of tectonic plates, but also in the depths of the Pacific Ocean also "the depths are broken up," as discovered by modern science, unknown almost two thousand years ago.


    Ecclesiastes 1:13 And I gave my heart to seek and search out by wisdom concerning all things that are done under heaven;

    “To seek out and search by wisdom.” This is the very definition of science, is it
    not? "Scientia," Latin for "truth," is the root word of science.
    Ecclesiastes 1:7 All rivers run into the sea; yet the sea is not full; unto the place from whence rivers come, thither they return again.

    The cyclical nature of nature encompasses us wherever we look. The water cycle is described only with utmost brevity in Ecclesiastes.
    Today we understand (considerably better than did Biblical authors) water
    and its importance in most chemical processes, as well as its profoundly
    fortuitous cyclical nature, as originally shown in the Bible. Beyond this, we can see and describe cycles
    of carbon, and nitrogen, and oxygen, and hydrogen. We are able to comprehend the nature of energy, and the conservation of not only energy, but also of matter itself. More complex by far is the transformation of matter into energy, which gives us sunlight continuously. Why should all these things be? And why so reliably? Why are chemical reactions so wonderfully and perfectly reversible? Why? For the same reason that we are “fearfully and wonderfully made”. For that reason. These Profound Fortuitous Interdependencies did not just fall into place with Megaluck over Megatime, as some atheists posit, with their fingers crossed.



    Ecclesiastes 2:13 Then I saw that wisdom excelleth folly, as far as light excelleth darkness.

    Ecclesiastes 3:11 He hath made every thing beautiful in his time: also he hath set the world in their heart, so that no man can find out the work that God maketh from the beginning to the end.

    Can you name even one aspect of our universe that is known “from the beginning to the end”? Research continues everywhere, with absolutely no end remotely in sight. Research at the subatomic level, at the molecular level, at the cellular level, at the human level, at the planetary level, and at the galactic level.

    How is it that we don’t know everything about anything, if all that we see came about from nothing, as materialists contend? How is that possible? Infinite complexity from nothing is infinitely absurd and infinitely improbable. There is not the slightest scientific basis or law for their grand proposal. Profound organization and information and physical laws, originating…. HOW! An infinite God makes spiritual
    sense. He is utterly beyond the purview of science - which is merely another of God’s brilliant creations. As to the mocking question of “Who made God,” Professor John Lennox of the University of Oxford gives us the answer: “If anybody made God, then He wouldn’t be God, would He!” (See Lennox’ one hour lecture, “A Matter of Gravity” on YouTube.)


    Two things are incomprehensible. First, the origin of everything from nothing, and second, God Himself, Who so wondrously explains and accounts for everything else. Everyone must choose his own incomprehensible option. The first is random and meaningless, literally and figuratively. The second option is elegant, beautiful, hopeful, and wonderful beyond understanding. This second option matches the creative genius that surrounds us.




    Ecclesiastes 7:9 Anger rests in the bosom of fools.

    Atheists are exceedingly angry and bitter.

    Proverbs 3:21 My son, let them not depart from your eyes - Keep sound wisdom and discretion;

    Proverbs 16:16 How much better is it to get wisdom than gold! And to get understanding rather to be chosen than silver.

    Again and again there are Biblical references to wisdom, prudence, diligence, and other virtues. The essence of science is the pursuit of truth, knowledge, and facts. However, wisdom requires more than mere knowledge. Wisdom requires the integration of scientific truths with integrity, and far more virtuous conduct than the mere accretion of facts, which are value neutral.

    Hitler and Stalin appreciated the science of Darwinism for its atheistic implications, but of wisdom, they had none.


    Ecclesiastes 3:11 He hath made every thing beautiful in his time: also he hath set the world
    in their heart, so that no man can find out the work that God maketh from the
    beginning to the end.



    Can you name even one aspect of our universe that is known “from the beginning to the end”?
    Research continues everywhere, with absolutely no end remotely in sight. Research at the molecular level, at the cellular level, at the human level, at the planetary level, and at the galactic level. How is it that we don’t know everything about anything, if all that we see came about from nothing, as secularists contend? How is that possible? Infinite complexity from nothing is infinitely absurd and infinitely improbable. There is not the slightest scientific basis or law for their grand proposal. Profound organization and information and consistency and physical laws, originating…. HOW ! An infinite God is utterly beyond the purview of science - which itself is another of God’s brilliant creations. As to the mocking question of “Who made God,” Professor John Lennox of the University of Oxford gives us the answer: “If anybody made God, then He wouldn’t be God, would He!” (See Lennox’ one hour lecture, “A Matter of Gravity” on YouTube.)

    Two things are incomprehensible. First, the origin of everything from nothing, and second, God Himself, Who so wondrously explains and accounts for everything else. Everyone must choose his own incomprehensible option. The first is random and meaningless, literally and figuratively. The second option is elegant, beautiful, hopeful, and wonderful beyond understanding.
    This second option matches the creative genius that surrounds us.

    Matthew 24:4 And Jesus answered and said unto them, Take heed that no man deceive you.
    Wisdom excelleth folly as far as light excelleth darkness. The Creator of mankind does not want anyone to be fooled; He does not wish that we be gullible, or duped by clever sounding words, whether they be from scientists wearing white robes, or priests wearing white robes. It is the essence of science to search for truth, and ask questions, and seek to answer them. Toward this end, we must acknowledge the extremely transitional nature of scientific “fact”, and the pretexts of contemporary scientific infallibility. Nowhere is the attempt to deceive us more malicious and destructive than when it seeks to deny the very existence of our
    Creator, and separate us from Him – permanently.
    Forty percent of those listed in Who’s Who In Science acknowledge a personal belief in God.
    You must ask yourself why. Surely these people are not the fools that some atheists accuse you and me
    of being.

    [CONTINUED]
    Last edited by ChemEngineer; 04-16-2019 at 03:06 PM. Reason: Cleaned up paragraphs
    “The explanation value of the evolutionary hypothesis of common origin is nil! Evolution not only conveys no knowledge, it seems to convey anti-knowledge. How could I work on evolution ten years and learn nothing from it? It does seem that the level of knowledge about evolution is remarkably shallow. We know it ought not be taught in high school, and that’s all we know about it.” (Dr. Colin Patterson, senior Paleontologist at the British Museum of Natural History)

  9. #147
    Senior Member Forum Donor Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsSocial1 year registeredTagger First Class
    Overall activity: 29.0%

    ChemEngineer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Posts
    3,622
    Thanks
    1,242
    Thanked: 3,476
    Rep Power
    15395537
    John 3:11, 12 Verily, verily, I say unto thee, We speak that we do know, and testify that we have seen; and ye receive not our witness.


    If I have told you earthly things, and ye believe not, how shall ye believe, if I tell you of heavenly things?
    The timeless veracity and wisdom of this statement is prophetic. After over two thousand
    years, what is often called the “myth” that is the Holy Bible, cannot remotely be discredited. To the contrary, the obvious and manifest benefits to mankind of Christianity have been repeatedly addressed by professionals in psychology, criminology, and other modern disciplines. The deep and abiding science, beginning with the first sentence in the first Book, is compelling testimony. For these reasons and more, Christianity is today the most popular human organization there has ever been. Yet many still “receive not our witness.” How can this be? Why will mankind not learn?
    I Thessalonians 5:21 Prove all things; hold fast that which is good.
    Is there a more concise explanation of the scientific method? “Prove all things”? The essence of modern science is the proof of testable hypotheses, as scientists like to say.
    Such technique was proposed in the Scriptures which are mocked by so many who are proud of their lack of belief.

    Hebrews 3:4 For every house is builded by some man; but he that built all things is God.
    This is confirmation of Genesis 1:1. Natural Theology, written in 1809 by William Paley, makes a similar argument from design. Just as a Boeing 747 can never be the product of an explosion in a
    junkyard, neither can the far more intricate construction of a human being be the ultimate product of random mutations, selectively but blindly “chosen.” See also http://www.2001Principle.net
    Mark 14:7 For ye have the poor with you always, and whensoever ye will ye may do them good: but me ye have not always.
    Although not strictly “scientific”, the foregoing verse demonstrates a profound economic truth notwithstanding the astonishing achievements of modern science. Had one the vision to see forward more than 2000 years to witness the abundance of food and material goods we now produce, surely one would have surmised that “the poor” would be no more than a relic of the ancient past. Not so.
    In fact, nowhere are “the poor” more common and more destitute than in socialist countries led by atheist despots.
    Acts 17:26 (God) hath made of one blood all nations of men for to dwell on all the face of the earth, and hath determined the times before appointed, and the bounds of their habitation.
    Notwithstanding the vast differences in outward appearance of the peoples of the earth, from fair skinned Norwegians, to African pygmies, “all nations of men” are Homo sapiens.
    All humans can, within the constraints of blood typing, be transfused by the blood from men of “all nations.”
    This close biological relationship of mankind was cited before blood types and biological classifications were ever imagined. Moreover, Charles Darwin repeatedly expressed his disdain for what he considered to be the “lower forms of life,” the Africans. This vile racist, who was an admittedly mediocre student in school, originated the hypothesis, not even a theory, of common descent, now called “evolution” or “Darwinian
    evolution.” From a letter to Asa Gray, a close friend and Professor of Biology at Harvard University:
    "I am quite conscious that my speculations run quite beyond the bounds of true science."
    John 18:37 Every one that is of the truth heareth my voice.
    38 Pilate saith unto him, What is truth?
    Eighty-two percent of Americans believe that Jesus Christ was God, according to a survey taken by Princeton Survey Research Associates on Dec 2 and 3, 2004 for Newsweek Magazine.
    Jesus Christ said that people of the truth hear his voice. Today one especially hears atheists, most of
    them liberals, reply just as Pontius Pilate did two thousand years ago with a mockingly dishonest question: “What is truth?” when even a ten year old has the capacity to know what truth is. Some things never change.

    Luke 21:33; Matthew 24:35 Heaven and earth shall pass away: but my words shall not pass away.
    Just as Genesis 1:1 foretold the scientific truth of the Big Bang, or as it is almost universally called today, “The Moment of Creation”, so too does the Gospel of Luke describe the passing away of matter. Stars like our own sun are consuming their own hydrogen, fusing it into helium, losing vast amounts of mass, and radiating that energy into the heavens. All starlight will eventually pass away, and the universe will ultimately become dark and absolutely cold (“heat death”), devoid of life as we know it. Numerous massive black holes have been indirectly observed. They attract matter and light into their domain, never to be seen again. Or so scientists thought before they once again changed their mind. It is now
    posited that Black Holes can radiate away energy, which is to say, mass. Even Black Holes seem to pass away.
    The duration of primary elements of matter we call protons have a lifetime estimated to be 10 to the 33rd years.
    The heaven and the earth shall pass into cold, dark oblivion, just as stated in the Holy Bible, a book ceaselessly mocked and ridiculed by the left. Thousands of years after the Bible said heaven and earth shall pass away, the Second Law of Thermodynamics simply repeated it, in the name of “science.”
    Universal heat death is the ultimate and final increase in entropy, or disorder. The origin of our universe as well as its demise were both described in an ancient book with astonishing precision. The universe has not always existed, as previously thought by scientists, nor was it assembled piecemeal. It was “created” with a Big Bang. The universe will not continue on forever; it will, it must pass away. These were not
    lucky guesses. They were inspirations from our Creator who made science.

    Footnote 1: By “the insuperable statistics of abiogenesis, I mean the utter impossibility of any
    naturalistic explanation for synthesizing even a single polypeptide, much less the enormous variety of proteins, enzymes, and related structures which constitute every living cell. Our polypeptides, as they are called, are so profoundly complex that even with a blueprint, contemporary scientists cannot produce them in a laboratory from reagents. How much more hopeless it would be to expect a pool of dirty water to produce hundreds proteins necessary for the first living cell.

    Footnote 2: By “insuperable statistics of the Anthropic Principle, I refer to the several dozen physical constants, such as the gravitational constant, the strong nuclear force, and the fine structure constant, which are so finely tuned that if they were as little as one part in 1040th larger or smaller, there would be
    no planet earth and no human beings. The gravitational constant in particular is precise within one part in 10 to the 10 to the 120th. What has been so desperately offered as an explanation for the Anthropic Principle is the preposterous fantasy of “Multiverse,” an infinite number of universes, of which we live in “just the right one.” It is not remotely connected to science or reality.





    * Profound Fortuitous Interdependencies, a term I invented, refers to the interrelated
    factors surrounding us that are utterly essential to life as civilized people know and enjoy. There is a pervasive elegance throughout our world and indeed our universe which far transcends the atheistic nihilism so popular today in what they call "intellectual" circles.

    First example of Profound Fortuitous Interdependencies: Oxygen happens to be one of the more reactive
    elements, and it exists in the most reactive phase, viz. gas. This dynamic equilibrium producing our
    essential breath of life is possible only because:
    1. Reactions are reversible (how profoundly fortuitous!) and;
    2. The reversibility of such reactions is, so far as we can tell, 100% and;
    3. Natural laws are consistent and harmonious and discoverable, and;
    4. Plants recycle oxygen from carbon dioxide, and water.

    Second example of PFIs:
    The sophisticated engineering of matter, constructed primarily out of three simple building blocks, electrons, protons, and neutrons, is evidenced by the fact that only one part in 10 to the 17th is matter, and the rest is empty space. Moreover these three foundational components can be combined with only slight variations to give us unique characteristics as found in metals, including high shear strength, malleability, ductility, high heat and electrical conductivity, profound availability, high melting points, and other features without which there could be no airplanes, cars, or even internal combustion engines. As essential as metals** are to internal combustion engines, they would be virtually worthless without hydrocarbons to burn in them, which hydrocarbons just happen to be available in wondrous, underground storage tanks, to be refined and used worldwide.

    But without oxygen, and without its dispersal throughout our atmosphere, there could be no cars, no plane rides to faraway places, and no fires, even inside engines. Fire, a simple chemical reaction we have always taken for granted, is but one of the countless Profound Fortuitous Interdependencies.
    ** In contrast to water, plastic, glass, and fused quartz, which transmit light with near perfection, unlike metals.
    Third example of PFIs:
    Vision, made possible only through the combined PFIs of the elegant properties of electromagnetic radiation in the visible portion of that spectrum, including the capacity to transmit both energy as well as
    information, over unimaginable distances, with almost perfect fidelity and reliability, and to be magically bent by a wide variety of readily available transparent materials, so as to enable wide-angle vision instead of 1:1 tunnel vision of an image roughly the same size as the receiving retina, and all the
    while photons pass through photons in every direction and in every wavelength, utterly unaffected in the slightest.
    Additional reading:
    Last edited by ChemEngineer; 04-16-2019 at 02:36 PM. Reason: Compressed dialogue
    “The explanation value of the evolutionary hypothesis of common origin is nil! Evolution not only conveys no knowledge, it seems to convey anti-knowledge. How could I work on evolution ten years and learn nothing from it? It does seem that the level of knowledge about evolution is remarkably shallow. We know it ought not be taught in high school, and that’s all we know about it.” (Dr. Colin Patterson, senior Paleontologist at the British Museum of Natural History)

  10. The Following User Says Thank You to ChemEngineer For This Useful Post:

    Knightkore (04-16-2019)

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •